sometimes you see a nip it. but the informationee i share yu don t never see that. when you watch this given the position you re in, given your sort of public figure. and you see how you re basically censored from some newsrooms or what you say is not really accurately or fully reported and then you watch your protagonist aoc or get enormous amount of time attacking i.c.e., attacking you, attacking immigration, attacking the country and so forth. soat you serve 34 years in all f these other folk who is serve too web and hundreds ofs thousands when you consider over 34-year feared people come and people go. you think the american people are getting an honest objective perspective of what s taking place? from the media? absolutely not.
let s go back to that wide ranging winterview that daily caller did with the president. he ll leaving robert mueller s finding up to m the justice department, leave itth up to th whether or not they will make thisr public. but he s been pretty outspoken. what do you make of the latest comment from president. he said a whole lot of things about the o doj and about the mueller investigationou in particular. we know that he is furious that this investigation began in the first place. we know he s made changes at the department of justice with this mind.tigation in soat now he says he ll leave itp toe them when the report is finalized. i think that could be a legal strategy and i think it could be something that he, you know, says something quite different about going forward. so, this will be something that maybe the department of justice will view as encouraging for now but i mou not sure it will be a final decision. he s saying he will leave it up to them. i think we ll hear abou
something really needs to change. sean: it s what they don t report, you re right, all the stories that you have broken and, again, we have verified everything. if we get one thing wrong, we will be obliterated by the opposition party. on the ohr thing. sean: yes. on the ohr thing, as a civil libertarian, i m so distressed that ohr would have a told everybody that this was a report that shouldn t be trusted. t that it was a report done by a biased source. and then to submit a request for a warrant to the fisa court without disclosing that information, it s so unethical, and it s so improper. you know, it s an exparty proceeding. that means you have a special obligation to be truthful.. look, only 1/3 of 1% of fisa applications are turned down. and that s why it s soat important for the prosecution to be credible with the fisa