and addressed possible retirement. chris: they would say you ignored calls and increased the chances that a republican senate will be there to confirm your successor. there are factors, there are many factors, in fact, quite a a few and the role of the court and so forth is one of them and the situation, the institutional considerations are some, and i believe i can t say is i take anything perfectly into account, but in my own mind, i think about those things. chris: so why didn t you retire? i didn t retire because i had decided on balance i wouldn t retire. on balance, i wouldn t retire. leo terrell, our finest legal mind on the panel. [laughter] i want to get your take it s the only legal mind. the only legal mind. thank you, dr. saphier [laughter] fair enough. but also the finest legal mind on the panel. you know, you have these people
i wanted to help protect myself. the united states postal service goes the extra mile my doctor recommended eliquis. he s lying. he knows exactly who the person is but let s take him at his to bring your holidays home. eliquis is proven to treat and help prevent another word for ones. if he says dvt or pe blood clot. .that is certain. almost 98% of patients on eliquis dana: you just said he s but history tells us that economies didn t experience another. lying. and eliquis has significantly less major bleeding katie: if we are going to don t live in a vacuum. we need to prepare for uncertainty. listen to adam schiff and than the standard treatment. believe what he said is true, and you can. eliquis is fda-approved and has both. his staff are the ones who have with rosland capital - a trusted leader in helping people acquire precious metals. don t stop eliquis unless your doctor tells you to. met this person, unelected eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. st
giving him an opportunity to lie. the question for the american public is do we want the f.b.i. to be springing morality tests on our citizens, criminal morality tests, giving them the opportunity to lie and giving them the opportunity to tell the truth? that s not a proper function of law enforcement. i hope the judge would see that and say something about it. bill: the question whether or not he talked to the russian ambassador. within his role he would have had authority to do that, correct? had they asked the question no question what he did was legal. bill: so why didn t he tell the truth bit? you re right, he should have told the truth. it leads to the possibility, the possibility that maybe he really was not lying. that s what the two f.b.i. agents concluded. maybe he just momentarily forgot. he didn t seem to be lying. no motive to lie. no reason to lie. he is an intelligent guy. maybe he didn t lie. maybe he told an untruth which
had his client put on the bulletproof vest and show the jury what he claimed happened next. courtroom show and tell. mr. stover pulled the gun out. he fired at you. mm-hmm. what do you do? that was amazingly fast. is that the way you did that? that s how i was trained. mr. stover was shot with his own gun? yes, he was. reporter: so now mark stover was dead in the hallway of his home. and soon after, said oakes, he went outside and was confronted by mark s dog ding. i shot a couple times until it stopped coming at me. reporter: so why didn t he call the police? he had said he owned the cops and seemed like there was some evidence that that might be true. i just didn t think they would believe me at all. reporter: then michiel said he wanted to see his kids before, as he said he assumed,
on o ground into consideration. chris: so why didn t the president say that? ,> well, he did in one way, a southland swaps that we have to take the realities into consideration. a lot of this is just nuance and is a man ticks but it has been focused on and that is unfortunate. the important point o, there is this vote in the u.n. coming up and unless we are willing to stand alone, if we have to we will veto the resolution but we need to get support for avoiding that. we had palestinians coming across the border, the israelis had to shoot them. we have to have a process in place that gives these people some sort of hope. there have to be practical reasons to do this even though i agree with paul the circumstances for negotiation are very slim because of the presence of hamas in the palestinian government. chris: and the question i want to ask you, liz, i know you don t like what the president said but does it make any practical difference? near the palestinians nor the