ignored it? so one of the first things they tried to do was to get a warrant under the foreign intelligence surveillance act to follow carter page, a volunteer for the campaign, an american citizen. they applied for the warrant internally in august of 2016 and the lawyers say you don t have enough. why? because they had nothing. maybe there is reasonable articulation is this small but to get a warrant from a court you have to have probable cause. so the lawyer is saying you don t have it. everybody is now frustrated, folks. that s not the right answer. so mccabe suggests, the number two guy at the f.b.i., let s go look at this steele dossier. maybe that will get us over the hump. just stay tuned. we ll talk about that in a minute.
i think maybe that s what she was going for. to suggest that there s a side of him that is good and that is just not visible to the public and that she is somehow, you know, evidence of that. she s the result of that. i think it s a way to convince people that there s more there that we don t see. so mccabe, early on as you know there was this idea that ivanka and jared would be a moderating influence on the president and on the administration, but in your atlantic cover story you said trump began to tire of ivanka and jared s incessant lobbying. new refugees one day, education the next. it never stopped. their efforts to change his mind on the paris climate accord exasperated him. it seems to suggest that their moral compass doesn t always point to in the same direction here. that s right. i mean, the clear trajectory of ivanka in the white house suggests that her own political
mccabe in his short time as fbi director approves the opening of two investigations into trump himself. first, did the president in fact fire comey for that reason that he explained to the russians? right? did he fire comey or do anything else to try to impies the government s investigation into russia s interference in our election? so mccabe approves, number one, the opening of an obstruction of justice investigation into president trump. he also approves expanding the fbi s existing counterintelligence investigation into russia s attack on our elections to include president trump s potential role in that as well. right? and that the central counterintelligence question of whether president trump had been compromised at some point by that foreign power. i wonder whatever happened to that investigation. anyhoo, andrew mccabe is the one who opened up both of those investigations into president trump. and for his trouble he found himself relentlessly berated and slimed by the president
what did you tell the president in january 2017? here is the dossier, i can t verify it, why don t you know about it? and use the same document and told the court that it was reliable on four different occasions. i want to know when mccabe reaffirmed again that without the dossier that there will be no warrant? i want to find out that did papadopoulos tell them upfront that i was working with the russians that would be a crime and i would never do that. i want to know a bunch of thing things. sean: i want to know a lot. he will get to the bottom of all of that. i will ask you this question. we have new leadership. the 2020 democratic hopefuls all seem to be reacting to and adopting the policies of the squad, i guess they are called now, and i think i look at the new green deal, and i look at every democrat saying yes, everything is free. no oil, no gas, no planes or cows, and i said that is the end
and you heard john solomon. help me out, senator. it sounds to me like a premeditatedmm conspiracy to commit fraud of the court to undo a first stop and then undo a presidential election, that s how i interpret it. mccabe also said without the dossier there would have e been no warrant issued against carter page. so mccabe says under oath it was outcome determinant. and everything you say about the garbage of the dossier is true, but this is when we t had mr. horwitz looking into this. and i cannot wait until he tells us what he found. sean: where do you go with this? you are the one guy that can bring them all in. and i really do hope, senator, that thebr people that did this were also involved in rigging the investigation into hillary. the evidence is pretty overwhelming that she violated the espionage act and then obstructed justice, from my little tv studio, the little that i know about these things. i ve been wanting to ask