and that was an 100%le pro of% the cases where she had o discretion, where there wasn t a plea agreement, a mandatory minimum sentence. it really is a disturbing pattern. at and when she was asked, for example, one case involved anho 18 year old man who had multiple videos, explicit videos of young children, 12 year olds, 11 10 as young11 as eight years old , engaged in in explicit sexual activity in one instance beingty the victim of a violent . and she sentenced the 18 year old man who had these videos on his computer to just three months in jail. the federal sentencing guidelines said ten years she t gavegusaid three months. and i got to say when she was asked about it, she couldn tt give a good explanation about why repeatedly she gave light sentences, lenient sentences to sex offenders when the law that . wpport i watched the exchange.at i couldn t believeex it myself.
we re throwing you out because there s a clause in the contract that essentially says, under our so discretion, we can say you re no longer in the program. and, of course, the question was whether he can actually sue in state court over good faith, fair dealings or if airline deregulation simply said no. this will be a good thing for the court to talk about in their decision probably sometime next year. okay, it s good 0 know. a lot of people sitting at home are saying what about me? how could this impact me and my frequent flyer? well, yeah. the question really is just when you can sue, when you can t. and whether you have the power to tell the airlines, hey, this is wrong. and i m going to take you to court. there s that fine line distinction in the law right now that says you might not be able to sue. that s what the court is trying to decide.