reputation, like vivek murphy was. but an existential threat to the nra. in 2004, the family members of the people killed by the d.c. sniper filed a lawsuit from a gun store. the store said he shoplifted it. he never paid for the gun. they had to take it off his shelf without them knowing. but the families of the people killed by the d.c. sniper sued that gun store saying way too many guns mysterious walked off the shelves of that store, were supposedly stolen and off the books and untraceable and used in crimes. the family sued that gun store for that and they sued the manufacturer of the gun that was used in the d.c. sniper shootings. to say this lawsuit this store lost track of so many guns and had so many guns
its grip on our politics. back in 2004, family members of those killed by the d.c. sniper filed a lawsuit about the gun that that sniper had used. he apparently obtained that gone from a gun store which said he had shoplifted it. he stole it. never paid for the gone. must have somehow just take ten off their shelf because they don t have any record of selling anything to him. the families of the people killed by the d.c. sniper sued that gun store saying way too many guns mysteriously walked off the shelves of that store. mysteriously stolen and off the books and untraceable and used in way too many crimes. the family stored that gun store for that and sued the manufacturer of the gun that was used in the d.c. sniper shootings. to say this lawsuit that this store lost track of so many guns and had so many guns quote/unquote stolen from them. the manufacturer should not have
and its grip on our politics. back in 2004, the family members of people who had been killed by the d.c. sniper filed a laut about the gun that that sniper had used. he apparently obtained that gun from a gun store which said that he had shoplifted it. he stole it. he never paid for the gun. he must have somehow taken it off of their shelf without them knowing because they don t have any record of selling it to him. but the families sued that gun store saying way too many guns walked off the shelves of that store and were therefore, off the booked es and untraceable. the family sued that gun store for that. and they sued the manufacturer of the gun that was used in the d.c. sniper shootings. to say that this lawsuit that this store lost track of so many guns and had so many robberies, that the man ewe fa manufacture
are often wrong. the trayvon martin case, one witness saw a black man with a hoodie on top of a white man. another witness recalls a man with a white shirt on top of another. the 2002 d.c. sniper shootings, multiple witnesses described a white van or box truck. police shut down freeways to frisk scores of van drivers. but the real car used, a blue chevy four door sedan. the 1995 oklahoma city bombing, a key eyewitness rented timothy mcveigh and john doe number two the ryder truck that used the bombs carried in the attack. but there was no john doe number two. that witness was not intentionally lying. a memory is flawed and affected by stress. the major cause of wrongful convictions is faulty eyewitness testimony. that s the major cause. and it s responsible and maybe about three quarters of the
continues to shoot him. reporter: who is telling the truth? maybe everyone. or at least they believe they are. just because somebody tells you something with a lot of detail, just because they say it with confidence, just because they express it with emotion, it doesn t mean that it really happened that way. reporter: cognitive psychologist elizabeth lofta testified in 300 cases since 75 and said over and over eyewitnesses are often wrong. the trayvon martin case, one witness saw a plaque man with a hoodie on top of a white man while another recalls a man with a white shirt on top of another. the 2002 d.c. sniper shootings, multiple witnesses described a white van or box truck. police shut down freeways to frisk scores of van drivers but the real car used a blue chevy four-door sedan. the 1995 oklahoma city bombing,