towns, and all those movies we saw with the guys would wander out carrying guns. it was all illegal, and a lo of those times you could never publicly kerrigan and i have a history professor who s goin to join us at the end of the show who revealed all of tha to me today. i am just so shocked, that those cowboy movies were, in some ways, inaccurat apparently it is a good reminder to al the originalist who wants to basically, rewind time back to the 1718 hundreds, that they may not have liked the gun laws. and nobody was questioning, nobody was saying that s un-american, that unconstitutional, everybod just went along with what it was. irony deep irony, lawrence those were the days thank you alex, - thanks lawrence a federal courts of appeals has agreed to hear attorne alvin bragg s appeal a federal judge ordere yesterday saying that th former assistant distric attorney, mark pomerantz, wh briefly worked for alvin bragg needs to testify to the hous judiciary comm
zero public consequences until today, when he was asked about it publicly. representative scotty campbell handed in his resignatio today. that does it for us, we ll see you again tomorrow now it s time for the last wor with lawrence o donnell, goo evening, lawrence. good evening, alex, i learn something today about what w call the wild west the old wil west that there was way more contro in the wild west, in those towns, and all those movies we saw with the guys would wander out carrying guns. it was all illegal, and a lo a federal courts o appeals has agreed to hear attorney alvin bragg s appeal. a federal judge ordere yesterday saying that th former assistant distric attorney, mark pomerantz, wh briefly worked for alvin bragg needs to testify to the hous judiciary committee in accordance with a subpoena issued by the chairman republican, jim jordan we report on that case her last night, the appeals cour has given alvin bragg unti tomorrow to file his appeals briefing
before and he possibly has involvement in many differen places it is noteworthy that smith wa having a consensual sit down somebody like giuliani, or the others, smith would right away dragon to the grand jury room. is there, as we first tried to find out, what he could tell them and maybe add to mark s point again and look a potential collaboration? barbara, if attorney-client privilege condition had to b pierced we would likely know about that because that woul likely have involved some kind of legal process to get throug that yes, i think we would least have some hints about that lawrence, as we ve seen before these oceans get filed in court, typically a grand jury matte their handled under seal but we know that there are a least a matter that the cour is looking at. there will be items that sho up on the courts docket, sometimes there are some goo reporting that fans out exactl what we are is going on. but i think we would know that there is simply some issue that are being lit
considered an incompetent by most people who have bee around donald trump prior to any of his legal troubles an now. so it is very difficult for the, whoever the professional aroun donald trump s, to be having t deal with something like that. the guy has never tried a case, he s always forcin himself to be around trump, he does seem to be something of a buffoon, and to mark s point h actually came on and its official role was consultant he tried to alter that, or h did alter that to attorney perhaps to try to exploi attorney-client privilege. his phone has been seize before and he possibly has involvement in many differen places it is noteworthy that smith wa having a consensual sit down somebody like giuliani, or the others, smith would right away dragon to the grand jury room. is there, as we first tried to find out, what he could tell them and maybe add to mark s point again and look a