decision. effective immediately. those stories were not heard in the courtroom. it was all about the ceo of hobby lobby. and his moral conviction. and then from the moral perspective, we re talking about basic fundamental equality. equality to make our own decisions about what we purchase with our own compensation packages. i think that goes to fundamental freedom and i think that the court s decision to should send a chill up all americans spines. justice alito writing, holding it to closely held corporations which sounds like a smaulg group. it s basically i think 50% of shares owned by less than five people. that covers as much as 90% of american businesses and interestingly enough about 52% of the american workforce. the court did leave open the possibility of the federal government directly paying for the women who would not have coverage via this decision. is that something that naral and
effective immediately. those stories were not heard in the courtroom. it was all about the ceo of hobby lobby. and his moral conviction. and then from the moral per speshl spective, we re talking about basic fundamental equality. equality to make our own decisions about what we purchase with our own compensation packages. i think that goes to fundamental freedom and i think that the court s decision to should send a chill up all americans spines. justice alito writing, holding it to closely held corporations which sounds like a smaulg group. it s basically i think 50% of shares owned by less than five people. that covers as much as 90% of american businesses and interestingly enough about 352% of the american workforce. the court did leave open the possibility of the federal government directly paying for the women who would not have coverage via this decision. is that something that naral and other groups like them will be