do you expect more antics like this in this trial? well, i probably would take issue with antickings because i think any criminal defense lawyer who has who is seasoned will tell you that you have to move from mistrial in certain instances otherwise you don t preserve for appellate review that s something they had have to do and i want amplify what mark said it is kind of a strange presentation by the prosecution. you know, motive is not an element of the crime. and i think one of the reasons the prosecution has shifted to motive is number one, their forensics has fallen by the wayside. mark was very kind in saying that smatter evidence has kind of i forget the word he used but the fact is that spatter of it is not there. the ballistics evidence while
do you expect more antics like this in this trial? well, i probably would take issue with antickings because i think any criminal defense lawyer who has who is seasoned will tell you that you have to move from mistrial in certain instances otherwise you don t preserve for appellate review that s something they had have to do and i want amplify what mark said it is kind of a strange presentation by the prosecution. you know, motive is not an element of the crime. and i think one of the reasons the prosecution has shifted to motive is number one, their forensics has fallen by the wayside. mark was very kind in saying that smatter evidence has kind of i forget the word he used but the fact is that spatter of it is not there. the ballistics evidence while
do you expect more antics like this in this trial? well, i probably would take issue with antickings because i think any criminal defense lawyer who has who is seasoned will tell you that you have to move from mistrial in certain instances otherwise you don t preserve for appellate review that s something they had have to do and i want amplify what mark said it is kind of a strange presentation by the prosecution. you know, motive is not an element of the crime. and i think one of the reasons the prosecution has shifted to motive is number one, their forensics has fallen by the wayside. mark was very kind in saying that smatter evidence has kind of i forget the word he used but the fact is that spatter of it is not there. the ballistics evidence while
threats, it is also the public conversation put in motion by the select committee s public hearings. since their last hearing,trump has publicly aligned himself with qanon. and we now no he that doj is investigating and that doj has at least commenced a criminal investigation into january 6 and all the people around trump. what do you make of where we are as a country, as the january 6 committee gets ready to resume public hearings next week? we re still deeply guided, nicolle. and there are those no matter evidence, no matter the narrative that has been so powerfully told by the january 6 committee, there are still shows hiding behind not hiding behind who still support donald trump. and their support is deepened at every moment in which he feels grievance. every moment in which he expresses a sense of being a victim, that the deep state is
Luhut Binsar vs Haris Azhar, Soal Bukti & Dokumen, Juniver: Itu Rahasia Kami jpnn.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from jpnn.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.