want to spring a perjury trap. and there s no justification for using the grand jury for that. we promised it was not a conspiracy. you re reaction to what s happened today. we can go back to the district court judge or you can hit any of the issues we ve been talking about. well, i m chomping at the bit. in regard to judge ellis, having appeared before him a handful of times in the last five or ten years, i m not surprised. and he was equally hard on mueller and manafort s lawyer and his legal team in regard to their head shaking and what have you. but he is a smart judge. i don t disagree in regard to how the process works. they shake down drug dealers and street criminals and what have
the only reason why i want to now talk to them in person is there is no justification for using the rancheria. laura: it would be lunacy. scott bolden, i promise it was not a conspiracy to take you out. you are one of my favorites. your reaction to what has happened today? we can go back to the district court judge and the eastern district of virginia, or any of the issues we are talking about. i m chomping at the bet. in regard to judge ellis having appeared before him in the last five or ten years, i m not surprised that his comments. he was equally hard on not only mueller but also made a fort s lawyer and his team regarding their head shaking and what have you. but he was a smart judge. i don t disagree with professor dershowitz in regard to how the process works, but they shake down drug dealers and street criminals. remember one thing, the judge
same category when it comes to this executive order? alex: i would assume he probably has some information about going on in iraq that i do not because i certainly would put iran in a different category. i think iraq is at least a because i ally, i don t know what is going on internally, but as far as what you can do, he can make exceptions in the order just like in legislation for people who are important toe u.s. military and its war againt terror, in the military can come forward with a certification process to say, this translator was instrumental and beneficial to us in our fight against terror, and have that exclusion applied. that is easy to do peer that is not difficult. meghan: i sorely hope they do that, you are a smart judge. kelly ate conway clamming a cnn report claiming that the white house is sidelining her media reporters over messaging concerns. but she appeared last night and again this morning, wait until you hear what she has to say, plus a new video could be gi
he s done it before. smart judge? not at all. he is a judge s judge appointed by george w. bush. he s a very thoughtful judge and republican second. he interprets the law literally, someone who has the a great respect for the constitution and the power of the judiciary in terms of playing it fair. he s a coach. he calls balls aened strikes, an umpire, rather. i don t think it s wise for the president to do this. and sean spicer, the white house press secretary, first said it was an outrageous decision and then they dialed it back and said it was an unfortunate decision. the white house is trying to calibrate and recalibrate to make sure you re not offending the judiciary. after after all, that is co-equal braunch of government. we did the two statements with outrageous and one with then we go to twitter and figure out how the president feels. in the new issue of political
she is planning to appeal. what do you say by dear sisters? i would like to hear what you have to say. part of this is reputational management and i think that is something we all have to do. we have to protect and manage when the bottom line is on the line. i understand why they would want to turn and talk about this. just tell me when i am ticked off on someone, what i can say. i know the judge. the judge is a smart judge. i don t particularly agree with the opinion. but i think opinion is protected speech. if you say that someone is a