a trading relationship worth £100 billion. but that pursuit should never come at the cost of economic security. and we should never leave ourselves vulnerable to economic question. we must be clear eyed about the facts. china is increasingly aggressive in the pacific, they show disdain for democratic values and human rights and they are seeking to exploit economic lavage. decades of ignoring these facts and tory governments cosying up to beijing have gifted the chinese communist party a stake in britain s key infrastructure. is microeconomic leveraged. we need to change tack labour is willing to work on the government with this and it is time for a full audit of uk china relations and to work more consistently with our allies to develop a long term plan for western engagement and a long term plan for economic security. because as this winter has shown us, and the modern
normal. in the private sector, they are setting around 9 10%. in the public sector at the moment, run 5-6%. public sector at the moment, run 5 6%. most people are accepting either a pay cut or there and that his desperate times. it a either a pay cut or there and that his desperate times. it a paradox in a sense then. his desperate times. it a paradox in a sense then, in his desperate times. it a paradox in a sense then, in some his desperate times. it a paradox in a sense then, in some ways - his desperate times. it a paradox in a sense then, in some ways a - a sense then, in some ways a demonstration of the power of organised. and also a demonstration of the powerlessness. the key issue here is to do with the labour market and transport, in the transport sector as we know the moment you go on strike, you have an immediate impact. that gives the union and workforce greater lavage than other parts of the economy. in this case in the docks, no strike for a long time so we have to
and i think it was someone - with one of the agents of the deal. and i think it was someone with i and i think it was someone with nato~ and i think it was someone with nato~ she and i think it was someone with nato. she said and i think it was someone with nato. she said russia and i think it was someone with nato. she said russia benefits. nato. she said russia benefits considerably nato. she said russia benefits considerably from nato. she said russia benefits considerably from this - nato. she said russia benefits considerably from this deal. i nato. she said russia benefits. considerably from this deal. but nato. she said russia benefits- considerably from this deal. but he said we considerably from this deal. but he said we need considerably from this deal. but he said we need the considerably from this deal. but he said we need the grain, considerably from this deal. but he said we need the grain, basically. i said we need the grain, basically. the world sai
alliance which in total has approximately 50 trillions of dollars of the economy. i would say they would try some scenes that for instance, blocking of the russian access to the accounts in the western banks. they might try cyber attacks, for instance, say four metres very difficult to imagine how the response inflict damage on themselves. they can threaten to withhold the flow of gas or oil but it damages them because they dependent on the money they receive so in terms of the economic lavage, it is a privilege of the west, not the russian. taste it is a privilege of the west, not the russian- the russian. we appreciate you talkin: to the russian. we appreciate you talking to us. the russian. we appreciate you talking to us. thank the russian. we appreciate you talking to us. thank you - the russian. we appreciate you talking to us. thank you very i the russian. we appreciate you - talking to us. thank you very much. our europe editor is in brussels. are so much discussion about w