decision not to come forward. joining us now correspondent for slate.com and dal you, it is hard, you re a supreme court watcher. and it s hard to believe we re here again 27 years later, and we re going step for step in this repetition for history. i think i want to push back. okay. because i think the theme has become we re just living it over again what we lived 27 years ago. 27 years ago was all men on that judiciary panel. 27 years ago women were mad, they watched that footage rachel showed of professor hill being interrogated about grotesque porn graphic detail over and over and being called slutty over and over and being compared to the exorcist. and we have the micro year of the woman and suddenly they were six women in the senate in 1992.
subjected to by those who want this nominee to go through. this is not a politically motivated action. in fact, she was quite reluctant to come forward, and she was in fact outed after she made it decision not to come forward. joining us now correspondent for slate.com and dal you, it is hard, you re a supreme court watcher. and it s hard to believe we re here again 27 years later, and we re going step for step in this repetition for history. i think i want to push back. okay. because i think the theme has become we re just living it over again what we lived 27 years ago. 27 years ago was all men on that judiciary panel. 27 years ago women were mad, they watched that footage rachel showed of professor hill being interrogated about grotesque porn graphic detail over and over and being called slutty
were of suspect provenance, there is no way for him to assert honestly that he had no way to assert what they were after the revelation of the theft. quote, any reasonable person would have realized they had been stolen, and certainly someone as smart of kavanaugh would have too, but he lied under oath. he should not be confirmed. he should clearly be impeached. the author of that indictment is lisa graves. she is a former senate lawyer who wrote some of those still len democratic document, the ones that brett kavanaugh said he never suspected could have been stolen. joining us now is lisa graves. ms. graves, thank you very much for being with us tonight. it s nice to have you here. thank you so much. so this story, which you have detailed to a degree that i think makes it very understandable on slate.com as of last week, it has really started to catch on as maybe the key hang-up, the key problem that emerged during the kavanaugh confirmation hearings. so you feel like the public d
with our cancer care specialists today. doespeninsula trail?he you won t find that on a map. i ll take you there. take this left. if you listen real hard you can hear the whales. oop. you hear that? (vo) our subaru outback lets us see the world. sometimes in ways we never imagined. on friday, just as the brett kavanaugh confirmation hearings were winding down, slate.com published this little tomahawk missile. the author argued that instead of debating whether or not to confirm brett kavanaugh to the supreme court, quote, the better question is whether he should be impeached from the federal judiciary. e-mails revealed in the confirmation process for
after the revelation of the theft. quote, any reasonable person would have realized they had been stolen, and certainly someone as smart of kavanaugh would have too, but he lied under oath. he should not be confirmed. he should clearly be impeached. the author of that indictment is lisa graves. she is a former senate lawyer who wrote some of those stolen democratic documents, the ones that brett kavanaugh said he never suspected could have been stolen. joining us now is lisa graves. ms. graves, thank you very much for being with us tonight. it s nice to have you here. thank you so much. so this story, which you have detailed to a degree that i think makes it very understandable on slate.com as of last week, it has really started to catch on as maybe the key hang-up, the key problem that emerged during the kavanaugh confirmation hearings. so you feel like the public discussion about this now, the political discussion of this now accurately characterizes what kavanaugh did wrong? w