It is friday and we have got a fantastic night crap grew recapping week it was, about lets talk about the day that is and we saw major developments in cases that involved the current former president. Judge Tanya Chutkan issued a protective order in dont rams 2020 election interference case after Hearing Arguments from the government and trump. She put everything that has to do with witnesses in the compartment of it and sensitive information. Not just grand jury witnesses, anyone that the government had interviewed. That is the first thing. And the second thing is that, even as she gave a negative to the Trump Defense team of not defining everything as sensitive materials, she took it away by making clear that anything that the government was concerned about in terms of both impairing the jury pool and also going after witnesses, would violate the order anyways. Judge chutkan also warned trumps lawyers that continued inflammatory statements from the client would only increase the need
Even as she gave a nugget to the Trump Defense team of not defining everything as sensitive materials, she took it away by making clear that anything that the government was concerned about in terms of both impairing the jury pool and also going after witnesses, would violate the order anyways. Judge chutkan also warned trumps lawyers that continued inflammatory statements from their client would only increase the need for a speedy trial. Also, in washington, attorney general Merrick Garland called a surprise Press Conference to announce the appointment of a Special Counsel in the hunter biden probe. Tuesday of this week, mr. Weiss advised me that, in his judgment, his investigation had reached a stage at which he should continue his work as a Special Counsel. And he asked to be so appointed. Upon considering his request, as well as the extraordinary circumstances relating to this matter, i have concluded that it is in the Public Interest to appoint him as Special Counsel. The white ho
against a guy who is completely not credible unless the media starts to say, yeah, we need to start acknowledge that what he s saying is right and the other guy s not saying the truth. stephanie, i have another question. you re not here to ask the questions, just so you know. fine, ascot. it s kind of a rhetorical question and kind of. not if the economy is such a slam dunk issue for the republicans, why aren t they talking about it? why is it all woke politics, grievance politics, all this other stuff, if they re going to win on this issue, why are they not slamming it every day? because you know the answer. because it s not a home run. we have a complicated economy, so you can t possibly say it s all good for you can t possibly say it s good for everybody, because with 330 million people, it s not. but republicans cannot slam him every single day and yesterday on the economy, because it s
questions, just so you know. fine ask it. it s kind of a rhetorical question and kind of. not if the economy is such a slam dunk issue for the republicans, why aren t they talking about it? why is it all woke politics, grievance politics, all this other stuff, if they re going to win on this issue, why are they not slamming it every day? because you know the answer. because it s not a home run. we have a complicated economy, so you can t possibly say it s all good for you can t possibly say it s good for everybody, because with 330 million people, it s not. but republicans cannot slam him every single day and yesterday on the economy, because it s not a winning argument for them. they have to choose something else. so it s actually dicey for them, to keep pushing on the economy. they push, it but they push without facts. they just push it. they just say, it s a disaster, it s a catastrophe, and then there s a report saying, this
for gun control issues and background checks and an assault rifle ban, combined with the white house seemingly paralyzed on the matter, one has to ask have the democrats found a slam-dunk issue where they have a distinct advantage to donald trump? joining the conversation, senior writer from politico and msnbc contributor jake sherman. let me ask you that question, is this or let it be, if articulated properly, a slam dunk for the democrats. well, the issue hasn t shifted a lot over the last couple of years. we had a number of huge shootings obviously. and this political issue has begun to build, frankly, over the last decade since 2009, 2010, 2011. so it might be reaching a boiling point but the crux of the issue with this, can donald trump, if want something to get done, the question is can donald trump take a position and hold a position for an extended period of time?