The configuration that they show in their section, okay. Is that the exterior wall of the rear, the top of that wall, is higher than the main roof line. Where the plan is located. Let me take a look at that real quick. So this is the section and this is the roof line, measurement here, with the vegetation on top, are you referring to this portion, and i am not sure where you are referring to it being higher than the roof line . You can see the edge and there is a Little Something there, and i dont know what it is, because this is a, a concept drawing, verses just a working drawing. Sure. And then you see that the roof is also concrete and you can see at the edge that there is a Little Something that pops up . Almost like a very miniature parapet. Or a curb or something, and i dont know how they want to detail that. The water intrusion, is that measured to that point . Or is it measured to the roof . The main roof . It should be measured to any roof portion of that structure, and so it
The appeal be denied and to up hold the permit on the basis that the planning determination on height is accurate and balanced of the issues that were raised are against a cocompliant structure. Thank you. The motion is then to deny the appeal and up hold this permit on the basis of the planning departments determination of it is accurate. And that the structure is code compliant . Yes. Hwang. Aye. Hurtado. Aye. Lazarus. Aye. Honda. Thank you. The vote is 50 and the permit is upheld on that basis. We are going to take a short break, five minutes. Welcome back to the board of appeals and we are on item number 7, appeal 13141. And this is patricia. Calderahead verses the department of building of inspection. 30323034 jackson street. Protesting the issuance on october 18, 2013, to nancy wong, alteration permit response to nov no. 201317501; shoring plan and sequence of excavation up to 20 at perimeter walls; revision to bpa no. 2007 07 12 6583; reference to bpa nos. 2009 09 24 7633, 2011
Number 7, appeal 13141. And this is patricia. Calderahead verses the department of building of inspection. 30323034 jackson street. Protesting the issuance on october 18, 2013, to nancy wong, alteration permit response to nov no. 201317501; shoring plan and sequence of excavation up to 20 at perimeter walls; revision to bpa no. 2007 07 12 6583; reference to bpa nos. 2009 09 24 7633, 2011 09 21 5155 and 2007 07 12 6583 and we can start with the appellant. Or the appellants agent. Good evening, im mike bowling, construction on behalf of patricia calderahead. In my brief i do not want to be redundant and so i have outlined what we would like to say but i would like to respond to their brief, which we received after of course, we filed our brief, page one of their brief states, they were on page one, they are appealing a permit based on financial reasons, not areasons pertaining to the Building Code this is a civil matter, and it is not related to the validity of the permit, however that c
Number 7, appeal 13141. And this is patricia. Calderahead verses the department of building of inspection. 30323034 jackson street. Protesting the issuance on october 18, 2013, to nancy wong, alteration permit response to nov no. 201317501; shoring plan and sequence of excavation up to 20 at perimeter walls; revision to bpa no. 2007 07 12 6583; reference to bpa nos. 2009 09 24 7633, 2011 09 21 5155 and 2007 07 12 6583 and we can start with the appellant. Or the appellants agent. Good evening, im mike bowling, construction on behalf of patricia calderahead. In my brief i do not want to be redundant and so i have outlined what we would like to say but i would like to respond to their brief, which we received after of course, we filed our brief, page one of their brief states, they were on page one, they are appealing a permit based on financial reasons, not areasons pertaining to the Building Code this is a civil matter, and it is not related to the validity of the permit, however that c
In high school and so it is exciting to see that occurring. Thank you for your comments. Thank you and, now we have steve giving the update on the construction progress. Good morning, directors, steve rule with construction and doing the cmo work for the tjpa and as everyone has pointed out it has been quite a successful couple of months since we last reported. As dennis mentioned we did have one, a minor recordable incident, a gentleman cut his arm while installing reinforcing steel and he did not want to leave the job and wrapped it up in duct tape and kept working and noticed that the blood was still dripping and so his foreman did send him in to get a few stitches, but minor only 12 stitches and he was back to work and is still working as far asvy been told. We have hit over 835,000 craft hours on the Transit Center to date since web corp work started with the utility and the fall of excavation work and 80 Percent Complete on the over all excavation and some of the other highlights