the comments that were made by that prosecutor gratuitous, inaccurate and inappropriate, the way that the president s demeanor in that report was characterized could not be more wrong on the facts and clearlyt. politically motivated. gratuitous. kamala harris rushing to thef defense of her boss after he got called a doddering man ns made a swiss cheese by the special counsel. the white house doing some serious damage controlmadeo after the president melted down in front of the entire natiof s so o they sent out spokesman ian sams and, of course, binder the case is closed. the facts and evidence refut refute the theories that are floated that they explored the publice theori. it s smart. and i think that they can see what s going on. you know, i think that they can see and understand you when people are gratuitous and make comments that they shouldn t have. i m not sure how many. you know, folks in this room have read all 400 pages of the specia0 pagel counses l l says
actually interviewed the burisma head, that form also say ints, he believes the payments made to the bidens were, quote, illicit. but the ceo bragged that he,t had covered his track tracks. the form comes after the whatsapp message, hunter showing a very clear shakedown and mentioning father sitting right there next to him. that s when he revealed that a textm, d that his daughter abouts daug complaining about giving half of his incomhtlaining e pops. and of course, the infamous message promising to hold 10%mom of their profit for the big guys who we know is joe biden. all and with the revelation of all this evidence. republican calls to impeach joe biden are growing day by day. i would say a more importanty bl would be a special counsel. a more important issue would be a criminae anhel investigati enough is enough. it is timel invest for a real sl counsel, a real criminal investigatiol specn to take plae to investigate what is rampant corruption. e tothis is no longer about hunr
the negotiations are taking place, and you have that matching with the public information, and the interviews to nbc and others that he was gone and the negotiations are over, and he was going to be indicted and then all of the sudden, he canceled an interview and went silent, and he actually said that he was doing that because the lawyer had gotten a call from the special counsel s office, and so the natural conclusion of that is what we are reporting which is that they went back into talks. i will tell you that in talking to my sources, and the ones who have been up for potential deal s wis with the sl counsel s office, and those people have gone completely s h silent in hopes of getting a good deal, and so they don t want to a talk to reporters when there is something on the table and that could benefit them and put it in jeopardy. so i want to bring in paul butler on the legal side of this and when you read this, what do you think? well, i think that the context is interesting,
demeaning and destructive to have the white house cy systematically undermine the department of justice. and when i watch these paid hacks on television, to be quite honest, i am sickened by how unpatriot cl unpatriotically they undermine. interesting words, in retrospect. gloria, we have seen this play out with democrats attacking the independent prosecutor, in this case, even a counsel. and now we see paid hacks on the other side going after bob mueller. yeah. in fact, it was newt gingrich who said they probably could and should fire bob mueller. so this act is complicated and it was changed in 1999. the act of kree creating a sl counsel? after ken starr. there was a sense that if you