eat? i did earl y too.m not hungry i don t like to eat late. i m not hungry late at night. i just assume. skip it. i haven t eaten late. okay, no circadian rhythm. i m a weekend morning show. oh yeah. yeah. so mornings i eat at four mothers at eighty . it s all over the map. you re on time to get three this morning. i saw her although bright and early this morning i was up at four. that s because you guys slept together. oh, and finally, here s a shocker. new york city isn t the mouth capital of the country. columbuscapital of , ohio ranksr one for swearings in vegas is second. the third is jacksonville for that fell. and , well, you you ve seen their football team. that s that s it.t s it jessie , each of, these has anl do except explanation. yeah. what do you think? it to me, they all do, except for columbus. jacksonville. come on , jags.be right. what was number two?r two, it has an explanation. . thcan t. that is it? losing money all the time. that one s self explanatory.
last but not least, snoop dogg giving nursery rhymes a try. called doggie land on youtube, a cast of dogs led by bow whistle, voiced by snoop. i m always looking for new shows, check it out? skip it. how we went from mr. rogers to snoop dogg i ll never know. this is what is it called, doggie land, not style, but it s not exactly paw patrol. animation is a little stiff, it s a positive message and i guess, look, if snoop dogg is not smoking a blunt and mock
lesser charges. you really have to understand this, okay? once you decide the question as a jury of whether or not kyle rittenhouse reasonably used deadly force to defend himself, once you answer that question yes, he did, the charges are irrelevant. they are irrelevant because he is justified under the law in whatever the charges were. you see what i m saying? the jury didn t skip it. they obviously looked at the charges, right? they came out. they asked the question, they wanted to watch the video, but you have to understand that part legally. it has nothing to do with politics. it has nothing to do with the jury. nothing. once they decided he was justified in using deadly force to defend himself, it was reasonable or whatever they feel, the charges go away. he s justified: it s an important point. now, we have his lawyer here
lesser charges. you really have to understand this, okay? once you decide the question as a jury of whether or not kyle rittenhouse reasonably used deadly force to defend himself, once you answer that question yes, he did, the charges are irrelevant. they are irrelevant because he is justified under the law in whatever the charges were. you see what i m saying? the jury didn t skip it. they obviously looked at the charges, right? they came out. they asked the question, they wanted to watch the video, but you have to understand that part legally. it has nothing to do with politics. it has nothing to do with the jury. nothing. once they decided he was justified in using deadly force to defend himself, it was