welcome to verified live,three hours of breaking stories, and checking out the truth behind them. of breaking stories, and checking the authorities in ukraine say more than 40,000 people are at risk from flooding, after a major dam in the south of the country, was attacked and collapsed yesterday. presdent putin has blamed ukraine for the attack calling it a barbaric act . while kyiv and moscow blame each other, once again it s civilians paying a heavy price for russia s war. this is the scene in the city of kherson entire houses and streets submerged underwater. some people waiting to be rescued in affected areas have been forced to spend the night on their roofs or in trees as the waters rose. the dam supplies water to large tracts of agricultural land, including in crimea. and the reservoir behind it provides water to cool the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant further upriver. both areas are currently under russian control. united nations says the collapse of the dam wil
hello, i m sarah campbell, welcome to the daily global, where we ll bring you the top stories from around the world. we start with prince harry. it s been his second day of being cross examined in the high court. the prince said he found it suspicious, that difficult conversations between him and an ex girlfriend appeared in stories in the daily mirror. the paper s publisher denies using unlawful means to gather information about the duke saying its reports were based on publicly available sources. our culture editor, katie razzall, was in court. the interest in this story shows no sign of waning. for the second day world s media gathered in a cul de sac in central london waiting for the high court s star witness. prince harry arrived here for another bout of cross examination. the mirror group is determined to show he is wrong to claim that articles about him were based on unlawful information gathering. mgn s barrister told him there was not a single item of evidence in the
impacted and influenced and controlled by technology. certain parts of those digital surveys are supposed to be inaudible infrastructure, therefore governed by non profit and yet, there is so much capitalistic kind of approache to control of the commercial aspect and commercial potential of this technology. i think that openai saga was, you know the fundamental tension is really between the nonprofit mission versus full profit. of course, there is a lot of nuance between this in terms of how they governed, how the board handled this whole situation, including exactly what technical concerns that the board has seen to compel them to press the panic button. last night, overnight, ijust woke up to a lot of discussion in terms of studies we can take unpack that a little bit more but the most important thing we can ask is what kind of, you know, technology, what kind of digital service should be governed by non profit and regarded as a public service and what kind of technol
a certain part of those digital services are supposed to be public infrastructure, they are governed by nonprofit, and yet there is so much capitalistic approach to control of the commercial aspect and commercial potential of this technology. i think that openai saga was. the fundamental tension is really between the nonprofit mission versus for profit. of course, there s a lot of nuance between those, in terms of how the board handled this whole situation, including, actually, what technical concerns that the board has seen to compel them to press the panic button. last night, overnight, ijust woke up to a lot of discussion in terms of 0 star study, and we can unpack that a little bit more, but overall i think the most important question we need to ask is, what kind of technology, what kind of digital service should be governed by nonprofit and regarded as public service and what kind of technology should be controlled by a handful of shareholders and commercial service? let
technology. certain parts of those surveys are supposed to be inaudible infrastructure and governed by non profit and yet, there is so much capitalistic kind of approaches to control of the commercial aspect and commercial potential of this technology. i think that openai saga was, you know, the fundamental tension is really between the nonprofit mission versus full profit but, of course, there is a lot of nuance between this in terms of how they govern, how the board handles this whole situation, including exactly what technical concerns that the board has seemed to compel them to press the panic button. last night overnight i woke up to a lot of discussion in terms of studies but we can take that later but the most important thing we can ask is what kind of, you know, technology, what kind of digital service should be governed by non profit and regarded as a public service and what kind of technology should be controlled by shareholders and commercial services? , sharehol