world. i m fareed zakaria coming to you live from new york. today on the program, the justice department throws 37 charges at former president donald trump. saying he mishandled classified documents. the indictment say the papers laid out everything from america s military weaknesses to foreign nation s nuclear capacities. what does it mean for u.s. security? should he have been indicted? i m an innocent man. i did nothing wrong. then, artificial intelligence may be the most important development of our time. but is it the most dangerous as well? we know it will replace jobs and blur the lines of reality but it could be a larger existential threat? i ll talk to geoffrey hinton, known as the godfather of ai, who said, yes. the worry is can we keep them working for us when their much more intelligent than us. also, how do you end extreme poverty globally? it is a very tall order. but ajay banja wants to do just that. he s the brand-new head of the world bank. he s tas
former prime minister of denmark concurred europe could not divorce itself from china. that is the end of globalization. that is why we want to de-risk, not de-couple. derisking, a term famously applied by ursela van der line,ine the biden administration now said that it also wants to derisk rather than decouple. sullivan reiterated that last week here on gps. but they worry this is a rhetoric cal change and that american policies and chinese responses will keep moving the ratchet up. what people in washington hear these views, they often tend to dismiss europe as to passive and passivist. assuming on china the u.s. will have to build a new coalition with india and japan and vietnam. and even with these asian countries, there will be limits.
intertwined into the global economy. [ bell ] new cars are designed in munich. it is research and develop centers in san jose and oxford, england and beijing and shanghai and assembles vehicles in china. europe is an interesting place to think about china. i traveled to germany and italy and britain and everywhere the conversation turns to washington s policies toward china. most of the political figures i spoke with were apprehensive. strongly behind the biden administration s policies toward russia and credits the president with united the west and infusing it with strategic clarity and purpose. they were far more worried about policy toward china and more fenlly about biden s new
it was years ago and that has to impact any institution like ours. but i made one thing clear to our team and to our board. we re in the business of trying to eliminate poverty on a liveable planet and i understand that is our first task and so while politics is important, we really don t have the time in our institution to get stopped by that. we have to find the things in common that could work on. and i spent time in beijing during my nomination and speak with the finance minister of china and we talked about where things could be worked in common. health care and pandemics and climate. these are ing thises that cut across boundaries and borders. if we look at the skies in washington, d.c. and new york in the last few days, the smog we have came from a friendly border. so we have to understand that there are things that we feed to work together on and that is what we ll have to do. a lot of people wondering whether china is willing to play in the multi-lateral system or trying to
not a pax americana, designed to secure american power and weaken its competitors but rather a global system that was open, free and fair. we are all need a well functioning and expanding global trading system and multi-lateral institutions that work. noted gordon brown. he recalled that president bill clinton described the need for stronger global institutions by explaining that they would indeed constrain america, but also constrain the new rising powers in the world. he said, we desperately need more of that enlightened self-interest from washington these days. go to cnn.com/fareed for a link to my washington post column this week. and let s get started.