that s what tata is calling for? , , ., , for? absolutely. the uk industry for? absolutely. the uk industry at for? absolutely. the uk industry at the - for? absolutely. the uk industry at the moment| for? absolutely. the uk i industry at the moment is for? absolutely. the uk - industry at the moment is not very viable, partly because of the energy costs being above other international comparatives and the size of the industry is small when compared with the chinese or larger bases around the world. my larger bases around the world. my point of view, it s quite a difficult task but i m sure the government will step in and try to keep these businesses going. just a quick thought as well, of course as you ve mentioned and as tata points out, many, many times, the global playing field for steel is seen as not fair at all, especially as china, which is a huge supplier, has subsidised its steel industry for many years. it s very tricky, isn t it, for the uk to compete and also europe
impression, the plant is not financially viable. impression, the plant is not financially viable. it s a good industry in financially viable. it s a good industry in part financially viable. it s a good industry in part because - financially viable. it s a good industry in part because the | financially viable. it s a good i industry in part because the uk has high electricity prices and more taxes than others and the government has kept taxes low, given the waiver for certain industries including the steel industry, to make it easy for tata to repeat before keep their business viable but is losing money and tata are getting impatient.- losing money and tata are getting impatient. yet, this -lant getting impatient. yet, this plant has getting impatient. yet, this plant has been getting impatient. yet, this plant has been so - getting impatient. yet, this plant has been so critical i getting impatient. yet, this plant has been so critical to the local community in wales. there
The original proposal would have required towns like Vail, Aspen and other high-country resort areas to allow denser development in all residential zones and along transportation corridors.
sponsors, those can develop over time and can certainly match and sometimes exceed the money that we are getting from the gambling industry. are getting from the gambling indust . , , , ., industry. i m guessing if they are still allowed industry. i m guessing if they are still allowed to industry. i m guessing if they are still allowed to sponsor - industry. i m guessing if they are still allowed to sponsor on - industry. i m guessing if they are still allowed to sponsor on the i industry. i m guessing if they are l still allowed to sponsor on the side and back of the shirt and on training kit, we are not likely to see a ban on tv ads and stadiums etc from gambling firms. from gambling firms. certainly not, there is no indication from gambling firms. certainly not, there is no indication from - there is no indication from government they want to extend any form of gambling. i don t think we are going to see it go the same way we saw the tobacco industry go in the 1970s, first