from the homeland security secretary today, kelly, saying this is not a ban and it is about keeping americans safe? listen, understand when you want to use a sledgehammer when a scalpel can do, given the fact that a skap pell would have been far better here, kate. the american people are justifiably apprehensive about radical islamic terror. but there are many things the trump administration could have done if it had more policy reviews over what is really the art of the possible. first example is threaten threat is not coming from syrian refugees who have been vetted, vetted again and vetted even up to ten times under existing laws and therefore probably represent the safest body of refugees that could enter the united states but for example, most of the homegrown terror community in the united states are radicals who radicalized on line boo you tube sermons of anwar awlaki or
under the sequester if it goes into effect it would still grow by 10.6%. so you re still growing even in the sequester martha: you have trillion dollar spending plans, $85 billion that would be cut, right? you say everybody on capitol hill doesn t want this to happen. i think there are people out in the rest of the country who look at it and go, well can t you find $85 billion to cut out of a trillion dollars in this budget? the key thing for law mak lawmakers and administrators at the passenger and all of these agencies is the ability to shift money around, the ability to move things in different places, and they they need that flexibility, and that s really what lawmakers need to give them, because without that it s sort of like cut w-g with a machete instead of a skap pell. skapel. many agree that they need to cut especially on the republican