gibb us a sense if you can for the next if you talked to the governor, the mayor, any other officials there outside of the synagogue when you were there and we understand that you may be headed to one of the hospitals now. there s going to be a press briefing at 4:00 which we ll be following. i was able to talk with the governor today, the mayor, senator kaye sis casey, the othl state representatives, city council members. this is a community that is united. we re united in grief. we re united in a resolve to protect these institutions and to overcome this. leland: congressman keith rofis with us on the phone, the congressman is there by the synagogue. stay with us p. us. we appreciate it. i have another one i have to hop on.
of times in closing arguments, would have reported with her imagery friend as well and talked about just reinforcing them in the jury s mind, all of the stories and lies. so i agree with you on that and the other thing, baez had a good closing argument, but no means accurate. if you have a doubt, that s reasonable doubt and absolutely untrue, reasonable doubt as to the he will. of the is she dead. killed by the criminal agency of another. is casey the one who killed her. as far as where she died and how she died you can have doubts about that, that does not go to the conviction and we expect that hear that the rebuttal. and how much of an advantage is prosecution s last words. it s the sandwich are the ening argument, the closing arguments and the fact that they broke for the night some might say that the jury thinks about what the defense said. tomorrow when they re fresh,
you had cindy anthony testify, you had lee testify, and who s the next witness you d expect to testify? is casey, right? but instead they re calling scientific experts again, and this may be an indication that we re not going to hear from casey after all. jon: tom, what do you think about that? should she take the stand? is. well, first, two points. i mean, one, i agree that baez was probably trying to protect the record in having her evaluated, but i disagree, i don t think this is going to be shielded from the jury. the judge is not going to tell the jury that the defendant was evaluated regarding her competency to stand trial and was determined to be competent. there s no reason for the jury to know that, and i think the judge gave this big reason as to why they adjourned to protect the jury from that knowledge. as to whether she s going to have to testify, i mean, look, i ve said all along baez overcommitted himself during the opening statement, and i think he s painted himself a