So we know she met with muellers team. Do we have any idea what they asked her . We dont right now, anderson. What was asked by muellers team to davis. But we know this woman, as you said, known as the manhattan madam voluntarily spoke with investigators. And what she knows and how she fits isnt exactly clear. But sources tell cnn muellers team would like her to testify in front of a grand jury. This really points to the fact that the Special Counsel seems to be focusing on stone as they continue this Overarching Investigation into russias interference in the 2016 election. And davis really has a very close relationship with stone. Theyve known each other for a decade. Stone is the godfather to davis 2yearold son. Stone put davis on his payroll. And conversely, when davis made a new york gubernatorial run, stone worked on her campaign. Perhaps she has information on his finances, his connections, his friendships, any other personal life matters. We should mentioned, anderson, that ston
Brynn gingras joins us now with the latest on her and how she may factor into Robert Muellers case. Do we have any idea what they asked her . We dont right now, anderson. What was asked by muellers team to davis. But we know this woman, known as manhattan madam voluntarily spoke with investigators. And what she knows and how she fits isnt exactly clear. But sources tell cnn muellers team would like her to testify in front of a grand jury. This really points to the fact that the Special Counsel seems to be focusing on stone as they continue this Overarching Investigation into russias interference in the 2016 election. And davis really has a very close relationship with stone. Theyve known each other for a decade. Stone is the godfather to davis 2yearold son. Stone put davis on his payroll. And conversely, when davis made a new york gubernatorial run, stoneworked on her campaign. Perhaps she has information on his finance, his connections, his friendships, any other personal life matters
many of their files say sin calle, which means without a street or no other city or details. and they re finding it difficult to find the parents since they didn t track the administration. they d like to say, well, we messed it up, but let s make sure someone else has to clean up this. it s been going on for weeks now. the government still doesn t know how they re going reunite these families. because even when people are deported, they re not sent back to where they came from. they could be sent to another town, in some cases i m told even another country. yes. so that adds to the confusion. and in this situation where the government, our government knew that their kids were still in the united states or should have known they tracked it carefully, they made no effort to say we need to make sure we know how to find these parents because we still have a child, a family member whose in the care of the u.s. government.
relow to find these parents, to essentially right these wrong in the first place? it wasn t the aclu that separated the kids from their parents. no, absolutely not, anderson. the situation is that the government has so botched the connection between the parents and the children that they d like to shed that responsibility and put it off on to someone else. when they sent the parents back without their children, and many of the children of the 700 still not reconnected to their parents, 500 or so their parents have been deported. they didn t track carefully where the parents would be. we don t know if they have more information than they revealed in terms of phone numbers or e-mail addresses. but in terms of street dresses, many of their files just say things like sin calle which means without a street, or maybe lists a city and no other details. and they re finding it difficult to find the parents since they didn t track the administration. they d like to say, well, we messed it up