Well as across the country. Weve had a lot of conversations about it. In fact this last wokeeek i had great scruggs hosted by Oregon State University with our title nine coordinators. There are a lot of common themes that we heard today, not only emphasizing the importance of the issue, but the regulatory overlap and sometimes conflict. I think youll find a lot of support among this committee for clarifying that. But also the resources needed to address these issues, and im glad weve had a lot of conversations this morning about prevention and the importance of educating students about healthy relationships. Concebsent and what that means,d healthy sexual encounters. There were conversations with the teach safe relationships act. I do invite the other Committee Members and other colleagues to take a look at that and join on. And for preventing, thats the best approach. So we know we can take stronger steps, not only in prevention. We want to make sure that survivors of Sexual Assault h
Draw attention to whats i feel is a real urgency and i think everyone else does. I hear a great commonality in terms of our desire to take effective action. And were struggling with what that is. And also, as a parent whos dropped two kids off at college that rite of passage that all of us have shared and the convey answer of that trust that we put in the inls tuitions that we leave them at and the expectation they will not just educate them well but a provide a culture they feel safe and not put in the situation of either being a victim or ap2,m bystand. So my analogy and i appreciate the last two comments about the analogy to the military, alot of this conversation reminds me of the early 90s when i was in local government and the Clinton Administration bringing up Domestic Violence and the conversations we have had remind me very specifically of the challenges and even though everybody wanted to stop it, weve got to be careful of approaches because were all subject to subjective opi
Different way. We would not regard success by a al nusra as a satisfactory or acceptable outcome. If i was put on the spot of ranking control i would have to think quite hard about that. Both would be unacceptable to us. We have made that clear to any of your partners in the coalition who have ever been inclined to think otherwise. It includes al musra but other parties as well. We recognize the situation on the ground is not as we would like it to be. It is complex. Sometimes compromises do have to be made on the ground, tactical compromises. You know, the history of warfare is you have to make tactical compromises. The complexity, for example, is everyone. Isnt this an area where british diplomatic capability, the capacity to coordinate in a sense combined with our unlimited hard power actually cant make difference in isolation. Soft power diplomacy is where the nations main effort in trying to bring others together. Thats where our main effort ought to be focused, isnt it . Its part