Jess hackman. Good afternoon. Im Jess Ackerman the conservation primaries for the Sierra Club Just a couple of comments one commissioner president caen thank you for your comments we would like to speak about the skweld schedule we hope youll say that. This is the time of the year. Great excellent and also were excited to see that the official notice is out in case you decided to approve the raised at our next meeting instead of the next meeting youre scheduled for. Thank you Enterprise Staff for doing that and making that possible to move that part of the schedule up and then also i wanted to speak a little bit to the folks president obama up to the green option after you initially enrolled it in the program thats something weve worked on in the past they and last year did a program they worked with communitybased nonprofits and had a confusion to see how much people to have on their email list to opt up and offer a cash prides for nonprofits the sierra club didnt take money from Gove
That is surveyed data but certain 0 pockets in San Francisco that are more inclined to sign up for dont work green one hundred percent ru7b8 products straeven what categories to go after you know customer bans was there be more apt to enroll in dont work green have we had this confusion. Weve begun to have those communications again now were offering both the standard you know light green product as well as the dark green product we might want to rethink who we introduce the light green product to first and who we market the dark green product to we motive want to choose to take those mathematics out again and say this was a neighborhood that was authentic and maybe market 9 dark green premium and see how many want to opt out into the premium. Do you think it would be helpful for a can comparison and the uptick over the years into whether they started at one percent now, its a 10 percent and how along that intoxicate and people are is there a way to encourage them to opt up into the be
Or not it leads to reduced rates increased customers or we then take the savings, if you will that center money into local bills; right . I mean, thats the design today. So todays design assumes any load this is contributed theyll will be margin to contribute to the rates but on the default product prides are really low and the supply costs effective we could go 50 percent renewal for that product or even higher in the commission deserves to do that but your pointing out we could stay at 50 have additional contributions to march because of the supplies are lower and take that margin and invest it in local build or Rate Stabilization or other policy objectives of the program. And it is on the reverse we talked about the rosy picture what if supply costs radio larger thats example wear asking for the authority to build it at 32 or 50 percent if the prices are hire and the program is costing more we want to slide down the scale to meet the affordability target. That includes the pg e fee
Revenues and look at it what they are on net this is what youre seeing on the bottom slide youre seeing at zero participation in the premium product full participation only in our standard product about 200,000 a year of net revenues well be able to invest in local construction or in Rate Stabilization efforts or other you know policy objectives but as the participation in the green product the darker green product grows the net revenues grow that is close to the one Million Dollars a with thirty megawatts of sales we expect the program to grow so that thirty megawatts to grow over to serving all available San Francisco residential and commercial load so what do you mean right now pg e serves 8 hundred megawatts in San Francisco and we serve thirty with our Municipal Program so you imagine that thirty megawatts growing it could be quite a large opportunity to implement the policy goals and objectives that have been articulated imply the city for the last ten years in trying to launch t
When you take those gross revenues and look at it what they are on net this is what youre seeing on the bottom slide youre seeing at zero participation in the premium product full participation only in our standard product about 200,000 a year of net revenues well be able to invest in local construction or in Rate Stabilization efforts or other you know policy objectives but as the participation in the green product the darker green product grows the net revenues grow that is close to the one Million Dollars a with thirty megawatts of sales we expect the program to grow so that thirty megawatts to grow over to serving all available San Francisco residential and commercial load so what do you mean right now pg e serves 8 hundred megawatts in San Francisco and we serve thirty with our Municipal Program so you imagine that thirty megawatts growing it could be quite a large opportunity to implement the policy goals and objectives that have been articulated imply the city for the last ten y