when and if people are blaming steve bannon for the stuff written about mcmaster over the last week or so. does general kelly take notice, does general mcmaster go to general kelly and say what is this? in so much as there are warring factions in the white house, bannon looks like he s been in the second wave of sidelining in some ways in that apparently the president was not pleased with this josh green book that came out that gives him more authority, gives him more of a sense, someone mark, if you read that book it s basically steve bannon got got him elected president. donald trump elected president, it was impressive, but when you have steve bannon again trying to dictate policy on afghanistan, why not just go to your chief of staff that s been all over the world, that s been in the marines and as i said, john kelly just sent his second son over to afghanistan. it is very personal obviously with military figures, and you
head of the epa brushed aside the findings of epa scientists and said, no, i m not siding with you, instead i m siding with dow chemical. whose ceo i just met in that hotel room. he declared dow chemical s pest side would be just fine. there would be no ban. never mind what the epa scientists had already said about it. we ve seen so many whiplash changes from the last administration to the new one. but the sidelining of science is one thing you ve been able to watch in realtime. last month we got the news that epa was canning several members of an important science advisory board. apparently after the scientists had initially been told they could stay. one of the ousted scientists said the cuts, quote, just came out of nowhere. for the record, the epa says no one was fired. the agency said the scientists could all reapply for their jobs if they wanted to, send in your resume. soon after the epa showed those scientists the door, the remaining chair of the board was
whose ceo i just met in that hotel room. he declares that dow chemical s pesticide would be just fine. there would be no ban. never mind what the epa scientists had already said about it. we ve seen so many whiplash changes from the last administration to the new one, but the sidelining of science is one that you ve really been able to watch in real time. last month we got the news that epa was canning several members of an important science advisory board. the scientists had initially been told they could stay. one of the ousted scientists said the cuts, quote, just came out of nowhere. now, for the record, the epa says no one was fired. the agency said the scientists could all reapply for their jobs if they wanted to. send in your resume. soon after the epa showed those scientists the door, the remaining chair of the board was called by congress to testify. the health science committee wanted to hear about what was going on inside the epa, how she saw the role of science in helping g
husband in front of her. talkbout somebody also saying, hey, look at me and the claims that i might be able to bring. she has a cause of action against united. yes. katie, paul, great conversation. thank you both so much. and thank all of you for watching. i m chris jansing. see you back here tomorrow 6:00 p.m. eastern. hardball with chris math uthe starts right now. bannon to siberia. let s play hardball. good evening. i m chris matthews in washington. donald trump ran for president pushing america first. no more illegal immigration. no more bad trade deals. no more stupid wars. the trifecta won him the election. now as might be expected, some of his backers on the far right say they re losing their faith he will pursue his hard-nosed nationalist agenda. the big sign yet is the sidelining of steve bannon, his chief strategist and the beating hart of the nationalist movement in the west wing. there are indications he s been put in a refrigerator or, in the usual russian par
least two weeks. at least two weeks, about what it knew with regard to general flynn. does the sidelining of vice president pence, does that erode trust in this administration at all? i don t think so. there is a difference between sidelining and checking out something. just because you have been told something, doesn t mean it is true it intelligence can be inaccurate. you are dealing with an attorney general, the member of the preceding administration. i am not suggesting that she would do anything untoward. you don t know the source. you don t have a high degree of faith in it if you are thinking through your options, that is fine. in the end, the president did the right thing. came to then t handle the situation appropriately. and got the resignation.