Number 7, appeal 13141. And this is patricia. Calderahead verses the department of building of inspection. 30323034 jackson street. Protesting the issuance on october 18, 2013, to nancy wong, alteration permit response to nov no. 201317501; shoring plan and sequence of excavation up to 20 at perimeter walls; revision to bpa no. 2007 07 12 6583; reference to bpa nos. 2009 09 24 7633, 2011 09 21 5155 and 2007 07 12 6583 and we can start with the appellant. Or the appellants agent. Good evening, im mike bowling, construction on behalf of patricia calderahead. In my brief i do not want to be redundant and so i have outlined what we would like to say but i would like to respond to their brief, which we received after of course, we filed our brief, page one of their brief states, they were on page one, they are appealing a permit based on financial reasons, not areasons pertaining to the Building Code this is a civil matter, and it is not related to the validity of the permit, however that c
Yes. Hwang. Aye. Hurtado. Aye. Lazarus. Aye. Honda. Thank you. The vote is 50 and the permit is upheld on that basis. We are going to take a short break, five minutes. Welcome back to the board of appeals and we are on item number 7, appeal 13141. And this is patricia. Calderahead verses the department of building of inspection. 30323034 jackson street. Protesting the issuance on october 18, 2013, to nancy wong, alteration permit response to nov no. 201317501; shoring plan and sequence of excavation up to 20 at perimeter walls; revision to bpa no. 2007 07 12 6583; reference to bpa nos. 2009 09 24 7633, 2011 09 21 5155 and 2007 07 12 6583 and we can start with the appellant. Or the appellants agent. Good evening, im mike bowling, construction on behalf of patricia calderahead. In my brief i do not want to be redundant and so i have outlined what we would like to say but i would like to respond to their brief, which we received after of course, we filed our brief, page one of their brief
The appeal be denied and to up hold the permit on the basis that the planning determination on height is accurate and balanced of the issues that were raised are against a cocompliant structure. Thank you. The motion is then to deny the appeal and up hold this permit on the basis of the planning departments determination of it is accurate. And that the structure is code compliant . Yes. Hwang. Aye. Hurtado. Aye. Lazarus. Aye. Honda. Thank you. The vote is 50 and the permit is upheld on that basis. We are going to take a short break, five minutes. Welcome back to the board of appeals and we are on item number 7, appeal 13141. And this is patricia. Calderahead verses the department of building of inspection. 30323034 jackson street. Protesting the issuance on october 18, 2013, to nancy wong, alteration permit response to nov no. 201317501; shoring plan and sequence of excavation up to 20 at perimeter walls; revision to bpa no. 2007 07 12 6583; reference to bpa nos. 2009 09 24 7633, 2011
Number 7, appeal 13141. And this is patricia. Calderahead verses the department of building of inspection. 30323034 jackson street. Protesting the issuance on october 18, 2013, to nancy wong, alteration permit response to nov no. 201317501; shoring plan and sequence of excavation up to 20 at perimeter walls; revision to bpa no. 2007 07 12 6583; reference to bpa nos. 2009 09 24 7633, 2011 09 21 5155 and 2007 07 12 6583 and we can start with the appellant. Or the appellants agent. Good evening, im mike bowling, construction on behalf of patricia calderahead. In my brief i do not want to be redundant and so i have outlined what we would like to say but i would like to respond to their brief, which we received after of course, we filed our brief, page one of their brief states, they were on page one, they are appealing a permit based on financial reasons, not areasons pertaining to the Building Code this is a civil matter, and it is not related to the validity of the permit, however that c
Number 7, appeal 13141. And this is patricia. Calderahead verses the department of building of inspection. 30323034 jackson street. Protesting the issuance on october 18, 2013, to nancy wong, alteration permit response to nov no. 201317501; shoring plan and sequence of excavation up to 20 at perimeter walls; revision to bpa no. 2007 07 12 6583; reference to bpa nos. 2009 09 24 7633, 2011 09 21 5155 and 2007 07 12 6583 and we can start with the appellant. Or the appellants agent. Good evening, im mike bowling, construction on behalf of patricia calderahead. In my brief i do not want to be redundant and so i have outlined what we would like to say but i would like to respond to their brief, which we received after of course, we filed our brief, page one of their brief states, they were on page one, they are appealing a permit based on financial reasons, not areasons pertaining to the Building Code this is a civil matter, and it is not related to the validity of the permit, however that c