down with america and death to israel during annual pro palestinian rallies across iran today, and peeking at a prayer ceremony, a top iranian leader threatened it would be a strategic mistake for the u.s. not so much for iran if we walk away now. translator: if a deal is not reached, it will not be the end of the world. we have been under sanctions for 36 years. and for the past 36 years with god s grace we have been standing straight. well, today a state department spokesman said it is not unusual to hear this kind of antiamerican rhetoric during iranian demonstrations, but he said that the u.s. will not be swayed by this and will not be deterred by it. leah, thank you very much. let s bring in jd gordon, a former defense department spokesperson and retired u.s. navy commander. j.d., thank you for joining us today. thanks. why are we still at the
mocked then presidential candidate mitt romney when he suggested as much. in the 1980s are now calling for their foreign policy back. the cold war has been over for 20 years. the general has spent a lot of time thinking bet these issues and has his own view but i think you he d be the first to save that doesn t necessarily reflect the view the consensus analysis of the president s national security team. those remarks yet by the white house spokesman, trying to distance the president s team from the frank assessment of russia and the existential threat it could pose with its nuclear arsenal and what was describe as its alarming behavior. the last time we heard russia atop the list of threats is from governor mitt romney. remember that? clearly some agreeing with him any other surprises? reporter: the general went further than the current strategy and advocating arming
table? one of our key demands is no longer on the table according to iran. iran wants to have its cake and eat it, too. it wants to have nuclear weapons weapons weapons and wants the sanctions removed. the thing is the sanctions have to stay in place until iran grants inspections. by iran refusing to grant inspections to their military facilities and nuclear facilities,ing this accord is meaningless airports weak now but if iran doesn t agree to have inspectors in, it s useless. so iran under that position will get a nuclear weapon. only a matter of time. so we have to be tough on make sure we have complete inspections and also a full accounting of iran s past nuclear work. you re touching on a key point in terms of why we even sat down in the first place from what i read it was so that we could get a better idea of where they are in their process and maybe not in real-time but as close to real-time as possible about them moving forward. if we can t watch that process what is the p
the record for being first. 12 hours before the airbus flying french pilot flew across the english change in his own english channel in his own electric plane. a party in, in city, celebrating team u.s.a. winning the world cup. women s world cup for the first time in 16 years. that s next on the deck. it s so shiny. i know, mommy, but it s time to let the new kitchen get some sleep. if you want beautiful results, you know where to go - angie s list. now everyone can get highly rated service even without a membership. you can shop special offers or just tell us what you need and we ll help you find a local company to take care of it. angie s list is there for all your projects, big and small. pretty. come see what the new angie s list can do for you. unbelievable! toenail fungus? seriously? smash it with jublia!
they re just very few of them, that doesn t seem like enough time but this is not a good week for the feds. we started this our with the feds messed up in san francisco through i.c.e. and their local law enforcement there with regard to kate steinle was killed with man who had been defeaterred five times on felony after felony connected in this country, and now finger pointing at the feds in this case, too. not to mention the opm incident. yes. 25 million roughly people s personal data out there in the ether, and what is go government going to do about that? how much money is it going to cost to protect those people s information, going forward. we re not sure that there s a protection as of now for that office personnel management. the people who had been refer refers for those who were hired