through the doors, it was through the shoots? through the doors, it was through the shoots? absolutely, i have no doubt the slides the shoots? absolutely, i have no doubt the slides where the shoots? absolutely, i have no doubt the slides where the - the shoots? absolutely, i have no doubt the slides where the way. l the shoots? absolutely, i have no| doubt the slides where the way. it is a dramatic doubt the slides where the way. it is a dramatic thing doubt the slides where the way. it is a dramatic thing to doubt the slides where the way. it is a dramatic thing to go doubt the slides where the way. it is a dramatic thing to go down - doubt the slides where the way. it is a dramatic thing to go down butj is a dramatic thing to go down but it will is a dramatic thing to go down but it will get is a dramatic thing to go down but it will get people is a dramatic thing to go down but it will get people off is a dramatic thing to go down but it will get people off the i
to deal the issue that the bill is designed to deal with. but the issue that the bill is designed to deal with- the issue that the bill is designed to dealwith. , . , to deal with. but they are caught up in it so would to deal with. but they are caught up in it so would they to deal with. but they are caught up in it so would they be to deal with. but they are caught up in it so would they be subject - to deal with. but they are caught up in it so would they be subject to - in it so would they be subject to arrest in it so would they be subject to arrest and in it so would they be subject to arrest and detention? in it so would they be subject to arrest and detention? [- in it so would they be sub ect to arrest and detention? in it so would they be sub ect to arrest and detention? i would say that we take arrest and detention? i would say that we take very arrest and detention? i would say that we take very seriously - arrest and detention? i would say that we take
western style combined arms. | something more mobile, fluid, - western style combined arms. that is hard and western style combined arms. that is hard and they western style combined arms. that is hard and they have western style combined arms. that is hard and they have not western style combined arms. that is hard and they have not had western style combined arms. that is hard and they have not had chance . western style combined arms. that is hard and they have not had chance to| hard and they have not had chance to gauge hard and they have not had chance to gauge that hard and they have not had chance to gauge that before hard and they have not had chance to gauge that before because hard and they have not had chance to gauge that before because they - hard and they have not had chance to gauge that before because they are l gauge that before because they are having gauge that before because they are having to gauge that before because they are having to do g
but previously had used that red flag law. then asking the mayor for his comment regarding the potentiality of using that law. is that a fair brief? okay. my view of the red flag law is that it was passed by the legislature. it s the law in colorado. and law enforcement agencies in appropriate circumstances should take advantage of it. and utilize the law. that s my view of it. i don t run the law enforcement agency, but that would be my advice to law enforcement agencies. i would caution against an assumption that the si circumstances of this case would lead to application of the red flag law. we don t know that. i would caution any conclusion either way or not. i as the district attorney indicated, hopefully there will be a time when there can be a specific discussion about any prior interaction with the, with
new and compelling evidence. he s the one, he and his team solved this murder, not me. ijust kept a promise. in one case, police records showed that ruth was spotted half a mile from her home the night rikki disappeared. in actual fact, she was at home at that time, being interviewed by three officers. ruth neave is pleased that we re reopening the investigation - because she wants justice for her son, which is fair, | i and i think any mother in those i circumstances would be the same. but i think it s fair to say as well, from our own perspective, we have to be very, very careful| about, you know, when and how and the reasons to open this investigation. - and from our own mind, subjectively, we are satisfied based on the information that we ve i reviewed and what we ve seen, that there are fresh grounds to open this investigation. l it s never going to be over. not for me, because somebody has took a life of a little boy