going wrestle a bear. power walk the mall holding an orphan. the moment it gets to the public it is trite and over. that is why it is a good tip for watching the debate. we are past the point of the establishment politician persuading us. trump obliterated that. you will never get that thing and then you have the promise of joe biden, who lied through his teeth. we know they are shysters. you have to find that one person with a personality. it is like the sextant it is like the sex pistols. you only know johnny rotten. is probably the johnny rotten of that crew and my only
found the 100 west lawyers in america to tell him what he wanted to do was ok it would make no difference if it was actually against the law and certainly it was. actually against the law and certainly it was. what about another defence certainly it was. what about another defence strategy i certainly it was. what about i another defence strategy that we have seen from the former president, seen their pointing to the first amendment, that he can say underlay about the 2020 election because he is protected by free speech. what do you make of that? he protected by free speech. what do you make of that? do you make of that? he had a riaht to do you make of that? he had a right to lie do you make of that? he had a right to lie about do you make of that? he had a right to lie about the do you make of that? he had a right to lie about the election i right to lie about the election and he exercise that right profusely and light all over the country. there was a point at which he ent
could say mob for several hours. he could say that we think 60 federal and state courts are wrong in rejecting our claims of corruption, find, he could call thejudges, democrat claims of corruption, find, he could call the judges, democrat shysters or whatever you wanted to. he could make anything up, but when he decided to actually establish counterfeit electors and engage in a conspiracy to pull out these counterfeit electors to try and substitute for the actual electoral process, that moved from free speech where you can say anything to actual criminal conduct. that is what is governed by the loss of the distinction between what is free speech and what his conduct is do you thinkjack smith can prove that in court? do you thinkjack smith can prove that in court? do you thinkjack smith can prove that in court? that is what we will see but the
mob for several hours. he could say that we think 60 federal and state courts are wrong in rejecting our claims of corruption, find, he could call thejudges, democrat claims of corruption, find, he could call the judges, democrat shysters or whatever you wanted to. he could make anything up, but when he decided to actually establish counterfeit electors and engage in a conspiracy to pull out these counterfeit electors to try and substitute for the actual electoral process, that moved from free speech where you can say anything to actual criminal conduct. that is what is governed by the loss of the distinction between what is free speech and what his conduct is do you thinkjack smith can prove that in court? do you thinkjack smith can prove that in court? that is what we will see but the