d.n.a., this would have been a strong homicide case if d.n.a. didn t exist at that time. show size, bloody tracks, blood on his left hand, the trail of blood going back, the fact that he would have had a key to the back gate. blood on the seat council ghats matts. blood on the driveway of his house. the other glove found there you wouldn t even have to know whose blood it was necessarily. all the items of physical items of this case were so interconnected d.n.a. portion of it could have been tried that way. this was the big exposure of d.n.a. to the public and to it a jury. and i think that the testimony of the prosecution experts on d.n.a. and its uniqueness and how it it matches up to only a specific individual was presented for about four or five days in a wonderfully technical way for forensic
d.n.a., this would have been a strong homicide case if d.n.a. didn t exist at that time. show size, bloody tracks, blood on his left hand, the trail of blood going back, the fact that he would have had a key to the back gate. blood on the seat council ghats matts. blood on the driveway of his house. the other glove found there you wouldn t even have to know whose blood it was necessarily. all the items of physical items of this case were so interconnected without the d.n.a. portion of it could have been tried that way. this was the big exposure of d.n.a. to the public and to it a jury. and i think that the testimony of the prosecution experts on d.n.a. and its uniqueness and how it it matches up to only a specific individual was presented for about four or five days in a wonderfully technical way for forensic
d.n.a., this would have been a strong homicide case if d.n.a. didn t exist at that time. show size, bloody tracks, blood on his left hand, the trail of blood going back, the fact that he would have had a key to the back gate. blood on the seat council ghats matts. blood on the driveway of his house. the other glove found there you wouldn t even have to know whose blood it was necessarily. all the items of physical items of this case were so interconnected without the d.n.a. portion of it could have been tried that way. this was the big exposure of d.n.a. to the public and to it a jury. and i think that the testimony of the prosecution experts on d.n.a. and its uniqueness and how it it matches up to only a specific individual was presented for about four or five days in a wonderfully technical way for forensic
d.n.a., this would have been a strong homicide case if d.n.a. didn t exist at that time. show size, bloody tracks, blood on his left hand, the trail of blood going back, the fact that he would have had a key to the back gate. blood on the seat council ghats matts. blood on the driveway of his house. the other glove found there you wouldn t even have to know whose blood it was necessarily. all the items of physical items of this case were so interconnected without the d.n.a. portion of it could have been tried that way. this was the big exposure of d.n.a. to the public and to it a jury. and i think that the testimony of the prosecution experts on d.n.a. and its uniqueness and how it it matches up to only a specific individual was presented for about four or five days in a wonderfully technical way for forensic
d.n.a., this would have been a strong homicide case if d.n.a. didn t exist at that time. show size, bloody tracks, blood on his left hand, the trail of blood going back, the fact that he would have had a key to the back gate. blood on the seat council ghats matts. blood on the driveway of his house. the other glove found there you wouldn t even have to know whose blood it was necessarily. all the items of physical items of this case were so interconnected without the d.n.a. portion of it could have been tried that way. this was the big exposure of d.n.a. to the public and to it a jury. and i think that the testimony of the prosecution experts on d.n.a. and its uniqueness and how it it matches up to only a specific individual was presented for about four or five days in a wonderfully technical way for forensic