debate, to offer amendments, to delay things in order to seek a compromise. but in the end, the majority gets to a vote. it is the second half of the social contract that has been completely broken by mitch mcconnell and so i think the conversation among the 50 senators if we don t have any republican partners is how are we going to defend that vision of fair chance for republicans to participate but get to a final vote? there are various ways proposed to do that. reverse the 1975 rule change which created the no show obstruction that we now call a filibuster but doesn t require actually speaking any more. there is the senator harkin version of lowering the number every week or so until you reach a simple majority to close debate. there is a variety of ways we can approach it but 50 senators have dto decide on which versio of strengthening or restoring the filibuster, the purpose of
decisions that occurred when he wasn t there yet. the witch hunt in the making. so the first thing for you to remember is this. mcconnell just showed you the game. i m not going to take offense to something that i would if democrats did it, because i don t believe they police their own the way i would like them to. so even if the investigation that i m referring to, that i don t like what they did with it is nothing compared to what we re looking at now. i won t have a principled position. that s the game. hate the other side, blame the other side, and that s enough. the position is opposition. i m against them. that s the game. and look, we know the fact. i don t like that they re going after bill barr. of course you don t. of course you don t. he played the game, too. he hooked up president trump for you. barr reordered gag orders. fact. demanded leak investigations be
last time a vacancy was filled. i think it is highly unlikely. if you re back as the republican leader, i hope you are, and a democrat retires at the end of 2023, that would be the anthony kennedy precedent would. they get a fair shot? at a hearing. not a radical but a normal main stream liberal? we will have to wait and see what happens. b.s. there is no wait and see. you know exactly what would happen because you ve seen the play before. he will lie if he s in the minority and say, you know, this is wrong, what they re doing to us. then if he s in the majority, he will do exactly. that like did he with merrick garland. lie, then deny, then defy and do whatever is good for you and smile all the way through it. that is game. biden is calling out the game. good! here s the real test.
was he drunk? or did he seem under some time of illness? do you know what? i did not see him acting in a way that made me think he was on drugs. at first i thought he was part of the maintenance crew or something. he just seemed like he knew what he was doing. he knew his way around the bulk head and the cockpit. then as people started to get closer and the stewards were starting to get him to sit back down, it escalated and i realized something was clearly wrong here. then he started he went for the big door. the big door to get in and out of the airplane and that s when i personally sort of reacted to the people around me. we just grabbed this guy and took him down and just immobilized him so he couldn t take this plane down.
she was probably hoping she could hold on. and that s not the way the world worked out. and so it s delivered a court now stwakd federalist society members. to sum it up, that means court members will be leading a court that believes in corporations over consumer interests, and voting rights, you name it. it is not a we the people philosophy. it is we corporate power philosophy. that is so damaging to the vision of a nation founded on the idea that power flows up from the people. not down from the powerful. and i am really sfunld the society members, particularly the originalists, there were no corporations that look anything like modern corporation. they have so twisted that to give themselves this false facade. so i certainly wish we could