though, is that russia, a foreign adversarial nation, massively interfered in our elections, both in terms of leaking information on a selective basis, scanning 21 of our states electoral systems, using social media in ways that were basically unprecedented, and they were doing it to not only show disarray but to help trump and hurt clinton. and that point was reconfirmed this week on a bipartisan basis by the secret intelligence committee. but the big question is did they do so with the assistance or participation of any american, especially and including people who are in the trump campaign s orbit? that is collusion. that is clearly the end point question we ll have to deal with. but have you seen any evidence of that? what we do know, and we have seen evidence, in fact, the leaking of the transcripts from donald trump jr. put out by the
dnc 2-to-1 and we took over the house in 2006, we took over the presidency. we raised more money last year than we had in 2015, in 2013. we have the lowest debt we ve had in years. and do you know what? because of what we were able to raise last year by the way, truthfully, when i came into the dnc, you know, it was a turnaround job. and yet we raised more money last year than we had in 2015. but there s still a concern and discussion about democrats divided. you know the dems in disarray hash tag that is out there being talked about. jess she is leaving, she is moving on, is that because of poor fund raising, does that show disarray inside the dnc? jess has done a spectacular job. she helped us lay a foundation by working tirelessly. and that s how we were able to win elections in 2017. the republicans will always raise more money than democrats. they passed a reckless tax cut.
else the president would write. speak to say. what s the difference? i think the white house aides are getting them tied up in knots over nothing. bret: but the white house puts out this call from the king of saudi arabia, where he says, the president says that he wants the gulf nations to all be together. well, he tweeted out about how the gulf nations pointed to qatar, and it seemed to be diametrically opposed to the message that this call tonight is interesting. speak at what doesn t help them for that reason. several, but among them is, that it does show disarray. you get the administration saying a, and he says b. in this case, i think it is very unwise. why should the president andd a major attempt to get qatar to shape up? they are doing this thing to boycott, cutting them off from
else the president would write. speak to say. what s the difference? i think the white house aides are getting them tied up in knots over nothing. bret: but the white house puts out this call from the king of saudi arabia, where he says, the president says that he wants the gulf nations to all be together. well, he tweeted out about how the gulf nations pointed to qatar, and it seemed to be diametrically opposed to the message that this call tonight is interesting. speak at what doesn t help them for that reason. several, but among them is, that it does show disarray. you get the administration saying a, and he says b. in this case, i think it is very unwise. why should the president andd a major attempt to get qatar to shape up? they are doing this thing to