in that case the aclu would be all over this case. they would say, first amendment, right of free speech because it s a leftist who is making the speech. but because it s donald trump, we haven t heard anything from the aclu on this. we haven t heard anything from the civil liberties community. you know, that puts me in a tough position. i was a hillary supporter, not a trump supporter. i m a liberal democrat. but i believe strongly in a broad interpretation of the first amendment. so, i have to be on trump s side on this issue. i wish more civil libertarians would understand the broad implications of this. you hear about shouting fire in the theater. that s the dumbest thing jus advertising holmes ever wrote in his career. shouting fire in a crowded theater is the equivalent of pulling a fire alarm, it s not speech. here you had speech, literally speech. i think he is protected by the first amendment. let me back up one more step. you have these protests, these ies. or even these to
shouting fire in a crowded theater. 20 debates, we ll have ten or nine. less in the traveling circus field but now people are juggling just to get on the stage. only ten spots. the games have begun. jane thank you so much. just ahead, the grateful dead s long strange trip comes to an end. the piano man gets hitched again. you re watching first look. 20? introducing nutrient-dense purina one true instinct with real salmon and tuna and 30% protein. support your active dog s whole body health with purina one. thanks for calling angie s list. how may i help you? i heard i could call angie s list if i needed work done around my house at a fair price. you heard right, just tell us what you need done and we ll find a top rated provider to take care of it. so i could get a faulty light switch fixed? yup! or have a guy refinish my floors? absolutely! or send someone out to groom my pookie? pookie s what you call your? my dog. yes, we can do that.
tendency to say vote my way on tuesday or don t come to work on wednesday. what he said in the guise of an anonymous conversation was absolutely an economic threat. that is, if you vote against the union, you will get within weeks a new model that s vital for the plant. he has claimed at the time that this was his free speech, but chief justice of the supreme court, oliver wendell holmes, and the unanimous court decided this in 1919. justice holmes said falsely shouting fire is not protected by free speech. and this was a statement that was at variance with what everything that volkswagen had said publicly and privately, which is the vote would have no bearing on where their product went. and he put it in the guise of an anonymous comment. was it a night shift security guard or the ceo of volkswagen who said this? it was inappropriate and
what we can talk about some. i think the article presented very good points. thesher said if the mayor opens up a dialogue, we ve done what we wanted to do. my question is what if the situation were flipped? didn t cnn do black in america? is in a a problem, is that the problem people are having with the conversation is this i don t know. i haven t read the article. but what there what i can tell, the publisher was saying if it opens a dialogue, that s fine. as far as a rebuke go, you re right, we do live in a country of free speech. i think part of the criticism, yes, we did it multiple black in america, we talked to diversities, minorities. the criticism here is he s a white by talking to a bufshnch white people. lonnie, he said it was like shouting fire in a movie theater, called it disgusting questioning the magazine s right
the highest court in the land where the issues that decide america are decided. my exclusive on piers morgan tonight. good evening. it s not often a supreme court justice sits down outside the court itself. i am here in washington it interview the longest serving justice, ant 99 scalia. they never comment on cases that are pending. everything from his faith and family to his guiding judicial principals and thoughts on campaign finance and politics and his colleagues. it s all on the table and my interview with scalia and coauthor of their new book. reading law, the interpretation of legal texts. justice scalia, welcome. brian, welcome to you too. thank you. the book is very much a template for the way you conducted your legal life. you are a man that believes fundamentally that the law in america should be based rigidly on the letter of the constitution. that s what you believe? yes. give or take a little. rigidly i should not say, but it should be based on the text o