for the country. you are not trusty enough to carry a firearm but can you vote. when you go into the vote to vote. you don t run the risk of being able to kill someone. tucker: that s where you are wrong, anton. please tell me how. tucker: a lot of maniacs killed a lot of people been elected to the ballot gox as you may know. dan bongino former secret service agent nra tv contributor and he joins us tonight. so a lot of people are saying, dan, as you know, you know, why should here you had this guy who was 19, was a nut case. bought it legally. maybe we should ban all people his age or under 21 from buying guns, which you say? i say i m really sick of liberals. i mean like really sick. physically ill listening to them because they can t be scon sis tent on an argue. i have argued with liberals about swawld gun control which you accurately called
shower and warns public to turn their guns in or else they will be sent to prison, too. effectively the government threatened law abiding citizens with prison rape if they didn t surrender their guns. that s what liberals are calling for in this country every time they talk about the australia i can t believe solution. a lot more ads like that. we will tweet them out tonight. by the way that s what the assault weapons ban is democrats push for a law outlaw more than 200 kinds of firearms, as well as all guns that have various irrelevant cosmetic features like bayonet lugs, lots of other things people wrote the law know nothing about. if that law passes and it might if the democrats take congress, you will be punished. you have fewer rights. but, wait a second, have you done nothing wrong. you never shot anybody. have you no plans to shoot anybody. it doesn t matter. democrats will treat you the same way they treat convicted felons as unworthy to be trusted with you firearms. meanwhile
us deduct today s wind emergency from our federal taxes? we ll ask around and get back to you on that. but first, the debate over the second amendment. last night we criticized the president for saying authorities ought to confiscate guns first and worry about due process later. that is unconstitutional as we pointed out. we re pretty sure the president is reconsidering that. news reports today say he is. we didn t want to leave the impression last night that the administration is the main threat to gun rights or to due process. it s not. in fact, it s not even close. here s a reminder of how the other side feels about those things. force these allegedly christian men and women who stuff their pockets with money from the nra year after year after year to do something now. so many thousands of people are dying every year for this so-called liberty. you have a whole generation of young people who essentially see the nra as their enemy. to them the nra is like the kkk just some host
system that need to be plugged. we passed a bill to do that and we think that should get done clearly. let me just say this, we shouldn t be banning guns for law abiding citizens, we should be focusing on making sure citizens who should not get guns in the first place don t get those guns. that s why we see a big breakdown in the system here. this particular case, there are a lot of breakdowns. from local law enforcement to the fbi getting tips they didn t follow up on to, you know, school resource officers who are trained to protect kids in these schools and who didn t do that. and that, to me, is probably the most stunning one of them all. there is a lot we have to look at. we want to protect people s rights while making sure that people who should not get guns do not get those guns. teachers. look, as we have sheriff rutledge has a bill that we re looking at as well that addresses this issue. he s a sheriff from jacksonville, as you may know. we re looking at the rutledge
that word you used the word idiot, i heard you use that before, who are you referring to specifically? i m talking to the people who do this. some of whom are mentally ill, and to them i would say, okay, misuse of the word idiot, but i m talking about other people, we just automatically assume some of these folks are mentally ill. i happen to believe there is evil in the world. but i m not going to so senator, when we talk about guns, hang on, one point here, i m not going to use the word you use there, but if you re talking about mentally ill, the issue is how do you keep guns out of their hands, how do you keep them from getting guns, if they should not have them? what is the tool that you suggest using to do that? we have the tools in place. they re not being implemented. let me say it again. the nics database has holes big