times that obviously you have to tell a story that a jury that needs to be compelling. in any case, you have two professors, one professor being the prosecutor. and that prosecutor is advancing one narrative. and the defense advancing another. i think in this particular case there couldn t be more divergent stories told that jury. from a prosecution perspective they were trying to paint rittenhouse as an active shooter. well in order to do that you had to demonstrate he was indiscriminately shooting for no basic purpose. they also tried to show rittenhouse as a person who shouldn t be there, an enter loper, a person who was making himself an emergency medical technician and shouldn t have come out and set off a change of circumstances. the prosecution didn t really carry the day. the defense s narrative is one that they advanced upon the jury is far different. describing the circumstances.
treat about the russia investigation and if you are perfectly confident there is no collusion, tweet about it a lot. but i m still open to anything. i rememb i remember ago new, and he walked out and reseened and if they walk in and they sit down with the president and say here is money laundering, family involvement, her here is collusion and data company and a lot of things could change overnight but let s wait and see because these text messages are deeply concerning. i understand that. then why they are not just pillow talk. do you believe rod johnson shouldn t have come out and gone so public because the responsible thing is let the i.g. do the job and then congress can question the i.g. report. i think it is fine for senators to bring a spotlight on the bureau and a need for a second special counsel icht wouldn t discuss any particular one because i don t have a full you have to lay out every play that is called to understand the game plan. picking and choosing text
the revolt of the people running it, the political worker bees, the ones that stay going against the ones that come and go, the political head shakers. what do you make of that? that s right. when you re doing a league investigation, you say who had access to this investigation and would have been in a position to make the leak. you re right. any time there s a transition in a administration, particularly when control shifts from one party to the other, you ll have many employees who for whatever reason might be politically motivated to undercut and incoming administration. we don t know that s what happened here. neil: i understand. but it does when stuff comes out that shouldn t have come out, phone conversations, data that is released. i can go on and on. it seems discussproportionate t this president. this is going to be an international security concern to say nothing of an i m
georgia? reporter: perhaps it was summed up best by a little girl playing meteorologist with a cone for a microphone. and today we ll be introducing snow. reporter: snow, meet the south. south meet the snow. there s a lot of snow. there s snow on everyone s boots where they go. reporter: for some it was their first snowfall ever. here. snow. reporter: when don t just mean humans. for man and beast alike, it was strange stuff, scary to put a paw on, even goat in a buried dog house seemed hesitant to come out. come on out of there. yeah, that s awesome. come on, lilly. reporter: motorists were the ones that shouldn t have come out. this bmw got stuck and its spinning wheels ignited the car. it s on fire, get out! get out, it s on fire! reporter: a wxia reporter doing weather live shots warned the driver who did get out. and while most cars spun out unintentionally, some did it on