when they are still in the business, they say they don t know where to go next. the demands are increasing for extreme hard-core pornography and go further down that road. opposed to things getting better, you can imagine it is only going to get worse. and with porning on if you being such a lucrative business on the internet, it is expected it is only going to expand. what s the solution? you have to treat this like a public health issue and that there has to be counter education to the young, people today what you see on the internet is not representative of what human sexuality is supposed to be all about. and this is not the way to treat women. last thing you want young men believing and taking their inspiration from, so to speak. john, thanks. scammers pretending to be u.s. servicemen overseas. this should be the peak of the oyster season. when i went to the oyster processing business, i found out that these are the last of the
talks about embracing diversity, multi cultural approaches, inclusion and embracing everybody. jennifer is saying that she doesn t, and correct me, david if i m wrong, but what i m hearing from jennifer is that she doesn t embrace homosexuality. so i m asking you, does this violate the code of ethics, and are these standards mandatory in order to be a certified counselor? that s an excellent question, yes. the beliefs, again, are not at issue here. we are not again trying to police beliefs. it is the behavior. from what i under, although i cannot talk specifically about this case, talking to others, espousing ideas about homosexuality or other beliefs is a behavior, and if that behavior goes into imposing values then that does become an issue at that point. let me interject here and say
how did the world come into being. you have a trite have a belief but you have to put down the answer to the exam, and if they say she doesn t have the right to have her belief system, that s a different issue. that s what they say. well you re in agreement because they say she does not have a right to this belief and she has to change her beliefs. okay, greg. i think erin would back me up and say her belief system is supposed to be put to one side. why don t we stop there. is that true? would you agree with that? in the counseling profession, as in the medical profession, the needs of the client supersede the needs of the counselor. there you go, by. bottom line. bottom line is the first amendment, i have to say. we will follow the case. we will bring the three of you back. i appreciate you for the
in erin because it says counsellors do not condone or engage in discrimination based on age, culture, ethnicity, race, religion, spiritualitity, gender, gender identity, marital status, socioeconomic status or any basis prescribed by law. so, do jennifer s beliefs violate your code of ethics? this is not an issue of thought policing or putting any restrictions on beliefs. of any kind. the code of ith l ethics is concerned with counselors and their behaviors and how they interact with their clients and others in society. it is not an issue of their beliefs, again. the aca code of ethics, the preamble is quite clear and
the judge says she doesn t have to make her decision before tomorrow that she wants to get it right. arizona s governor says the feds forced the issue. we are being invaded by illegal immigration in the state of arizona, and this is another tool, and we are just helping the feds do their job because they won t do it. the bottom line is that the people of arizona are frustrated. we shouldn t have to do it. the federal government should be doing it, and if they won t, well, the legislature and the people of arizona overwhelmingly believe that we need to enforce it and help them do their job, and we re a nation of laws, and we hope that those laws will be enforced. governor brewer also stressed that anyone who discriminates while enforcing the law would be punished. among other things, the law requires police to question the residency status of people they stop. critics fear it will lead to racial profiling. so what do you think, jose,