of getting on the jury to convict. you know, manhattan is a professor points out, is an inherently hostile venue for the accused and in a politically charged case agains cliset an outspoken political candidate that s hated, especially either here in manhattan, the jurors are predisposed. the outcome is preordained. this case shoul d have been moved elsewhere to staten island, for example, where at least the jury pool wouldulde be more balanced. but alvin bragg opposed it. so mor, judge merchan, no coincidence, which is evidence they both know this prosecution is legally, if not utterly absurd. so they are counting on a o prejudiced jury to convict. this is a wretchedn abuse of power in our justice system. and i agree with professor dershowitz. this is unquestionablyd irrefutably election interference. inthey want to be able to calltm
. what s your take, mark what is?. well, i ll tell you, i m an that throwback to when you i usedghti to fight during the 90s over the whitewater trials and whendn we were down in little rock making little spats,that w that wasn t a real fight. right exactly. that was back when markhe levin was not the great one. so, you know, it s an interesting thing to me not that they do not have a sequestered jury. i meanhave t sequest, as a criml lawyer, if i m defending this case and susan and toddand to are excellent lawyers, excellent trial lawyers, they it nt ts unfair. i it really is unfair to a defendant to in the middle of ae presidential campaign to takef h anm off the trail, force him to be in a courtroom and have it in a venue where already we ve already seen demonstrably one of the jurors was deathly afraid of her name getting outne and felt like she wouldt be intimidatedit. o
of pennsylvania. unfortunately for joe, almost nobody noticed or cared except to point out, well, his numerous awkward campaign trail blunders. this may go down as the uncle buzzy cannibalism week. ex a matter of fact, it extended to an appearance, by the way, in dc todateany. in case you missed it. here s a recap. what s it take to be an electrician? instead recap.is what you do.nt what? you get a little bit of trainint g. 4 to 5 years of training to become an electrician is the best in the world. that s seeing how critical the ibew is and how transformative a project, b the project you re going to be making for the country. for seven important foreignmporti products i m exporting forng the products and i m going to go order. i m yeah, for just being the
the likelihood of people being able l to not take into account their personal views, their political views, their hatred for donald trump is negligible. t so i don t think he s going to get a fair trial. i think it s ver iy possiblee he ll get convicted in time for the election. genit will have an impact on the election, and then the conviction will be reversed on appeal. but election interference will havrevers ee been accomplis i want to see this electioeenre fair and square. whoever wins this election ought to be able do it proudly,o and whoever loses it should be able to say, i lostt pr it fi and square. that s not happening with thisrn trial. and with the other four cases, including the civil case wit against him that are constituting election interference. it s a scandal.cons much of itti is unconstitutionao and all of it is un-american. and it s amazing. liberals will say, well, he ll have a chance on appeal on the issue of recusae hal andn
high level, seemingly involved in this case, according to elise stefanik. on top of that, you have the statute of limitations have passed on what would be osf misdemeanor charge in new york. but somehow we still don tin n completely know how alvin bragg has somehow connected this to a federal crime that the doj passed on. lat thethey want to charge trumn and try to make this into t a felonyru case on every level here. and the president has a gagon order on every level. i don t see equal justice under the law. i don t see a fair trial. i don t see an environmenthere where where i would feel comfortable that justice is being served. your thought i wous? i agree completely. as a liberal democrat and civil libertarian, i am appalled that the first case, criminal case against the president is the case i ve seen in 60 o years of practice in writing