people. i don t think, by the way, ali, we re going to end up in a shooting war in the middle east because it doesn t serve anybody s interests, but there is the potential for miscalculation here, if the iranians nail one of the u.s. navy destroyers and kill a bunch of our sailors, my guess would be it s 100% certain we re going to go after them, and it would be an ugly war with our overwhelming advantage, not asymmetric favor of the iranians, it s u.s. advantage but it s not going to achieve our purpose. general, i want to read one more sentence from this new york times brand-new reporting, it was not clear whether mr. trump simply changed his mind on the strikes or whether the administration altered course because of logistics or strategy, it was also not clear whether the attacks might still go forward. so as of now, we do not know what the plan is, but we do know that until 7:00 p.m. this evening, there was the
something like that again, but air campaigns have never been conclusive on their own in achieving an objective like this. you have to do diplomacy backed up perhaps by the threat of allied economic and military intervention. we got to sit down and think through our strategy, decide on our objectives and engage these people. i don t imagine, by the way, ali, we re going to end up in a shooting war in the middle east because it doesn t serve anybody s interests, but there is the potential for miscalculation here, if the iranians nail one of the u.s. navy destroyers and kill a bunch of our sailors, my guess would be it s 100% certain we re going to go after them, and it would be an ugly war with our overwhelming advantage, not asymmetric favor of the iranians, it s u.s. advantage but it s not going to achieve our purpose. general i want to read one more sentence from this new york times brand new reporting, it was not clear whether mr. trump simply changed his mind on the strikes or w
this. you have to do diplomacy backed up perhaps by the threat of allied economic and military intervention. we got to sit down and think through our strategy, decide on our objectives and engage these people. i don t imagine, by the way, ali, we re going to end up in a shooting war in the middle east because it doesn t serve anybody s interests, but there is the potential for miscalculation here, if the iranians nail one of the u.s. navy destroyers and kill a bunch of our sailors, my guess would be it s 100% certain we re going to go after them, and it would be an ugly war with our overwhelming advantage, not asymmetric favor of the iranians, it s u.s. advantage but it s not going to achieve our purpose. general i want to read one more sentence from this new york times brand new reporting, it was not clear whether mr. trump simply changed his mind on the strikes or whether the administration altered course
team and iran. john bolton, the crown prince of saudi arabia is being driven to conflict, necessary conflict and i m not sure how that plays. i hope the president if indeed he is with john bolton, a neoconservative hawk and his center circle, i just hope we don t do something or get pushed into something accidental where we get back into a scenario with massive destruction in the middle east, the irradiance under attack lashing out at us. they say they survived genghis khan and alexander the great and they will survive america. the last thing the president s campaign needs right now is a shooting war in the middle east. i know that he resists generally speaking, he said he opposed the war in iraq.