raided the coffers of public funds and routinely attack those who criticize him. mlo s entire term in office claim to speak for the poor, attack the elites and meanwhile run a shoddy, government. he released the journalist s personal income information which the mexican bar association said violated the constitution and the tax code. amlo campaigned on a promise to fight corruption, and mexicans against corruption and i punity, his government awards three out of four contracts using a no-bid system that does not even ask for competing offers. mexico s biggest problem is not an economic one, but rather a political one. the state has lost its capacity to rein in the drug cartels which run large parts of the country. amlo campaigned on the slogan of
which race negatively impacts so many groups of people. so, these two arguments can have long term effects, respected at the fact that she does not currently sit in the majority of the court. this can have a long term impact on just which if arguments can come forward to the court, especially from conservative folks, who want to rely on that kind of originalism, that he has not diminished dismantled. let me bring you in on the point that britney talked about here, which is during the oral arguments, justice jackson, she zeroed in on the 14th amendment but specifically dismissed the idea that the founders believed that recent shoddy was required when they brought it because by doing so, she really dips her toes into this originalism theory, which is most commonly associated with conservative legal arguments on the court. talk to us about the significance of slipping that on a set. yeah, she did more than she picked up the republican