muslims confront radical israelis, was problematic and i think it was possibly a shock tactic headline in order to get more views in order to promote what is possibly you want a harmonious message but do you not see how that is problematic? there is a different way of communicating? you are objecting to the term radical israelis . are there such things as radical iranians? are radical koreans? but i m objecting to radical israelis because you went to speak to some fairly religious jewish people who are british people, and you definitely don t know if they are israelis. they identified as such. i did not see a single person in that video identify themselves as an israeli. there was more than one video. you have to look at all of them. did any of them say, my passport is. ? yes, they said, we re dual nationals. that very much is not in the video. that s that video but there s a collection of videos. you have to look at all of them.
if it does not accumulate or generate some kind of controversy, usually we re talking about some mundane issue which isn t worth talking about in the first place. specifically, that video, it did strike me as problematic in lots of ways and specifically the title of the video, muslims confront radical israelis, was problematic and i think it was possibly a shock tactic headline in order to get more views in order to promote what is possibly you want a harmonious message but do you not see how that is problematic? there is a different way of communicating? you are objecting to the term radical israelis . are there such things as radical iranians? are radical koreans? but i m objecting to radical israelis because you went to speak to some fairly religious jewish people who are british people, and you definitely don t know if they are israelis. they identified as such.
problematic in lots of ways and specifically the title of the video, muslims confront radical israelis was problematic and it was possibly a shock tactic headline in order to get more views in order to promote a more harmonious message but do you not see how that is problematic? there is a different way of communicating? you are objecting to radical israelis. you are ob ecting to radical israelis. . . you are ob ecting to radical israelis. , ., israelis. because you went to seak to israelis. because you went to speak to some israelis. because you went to speak to some fairly israelis. because you went to speak to some fairly religious i speak to some fairly religious jewish people who are british people and you don t know if they are israelis. they are israelis. they identified they are israelis. they identified as they are israelis. they identified as such. i i they are israelis. they | identified as such. i did they are israelis. they i identified as such. i did not see a
if someone identifies as an israeli supporter, an apologist or a pro zionist, they have already shown their cards. what we re saying is there is a difference between israeli discourse or pro israeli discourse. when we say that we mean those who are sympathetic or apologetic to the policies of the israeli government, the policies of blockade, the policies of settlement. if we decide to oppose these policies, that should never be conflated with anti jewishness. if we re going have any discussion whatsoever, if it does not accumulate or generate some kind of controversy, usually we re talking about some mundane issue which isn t with talking about in the first place. specifically, that video, it did strike me as problematic in lots of ways and specifically the title of the video, muslims confront radical muslims confront radical israelis, was problematic and i think it was possibly a shock tactic headline in order to get more