liability? jim, i completely disagree with avery. she has no shot of a case here. absolutely not. why not? because her job was offered b k back? that s damages. that has nothing to do with liability. truth is a defense. those are her words on the video. breitbart was not meaning to be malicious in any way, shape, form. that s what he s going to argue. what he s going to say is he tried to expose some sort of racism within the naacp and those were her. the edited excerpts of that video, richard, are what aired first and those excerpts did not tell the whole story and breitbart said this has nothing to do with shirly sherrod. he wanted to show there s racism. but legally can you use somebody, you know, a third case to make a case about an organization, whether or not