For federal contractors on the topic of paid sick leave, but also we talked about the middle class, and his idea of middle class economics. Heres a bit from that speech yesterday. [video clip] president obama republican to try to rebrand themselves as the party of the middle class. Im glad they are doing it. I want them to start rethinking their positions on issues. I would love to work with them on stuff. But you cant just talk the talk. Youve got to walk the walk. You cant talk middleclass and then do things that hurt the middle class. You cant say you care about working people and then do things that hurt working people. I will give you an example. Republicans in washington have the chance to prove they really care about working families. Congress has to pass a budget. This month, or they risk shutting down the government for the second time in two years. Everybody knows the World Economy is pretty volatile right now. Our economy is a relative bright spot. We are doing better than j
For federal contractors on the topic of paid sick leave, but also we talked about the middle class, and his idea of middle class economics. Heres a bit from that speech yesterday. [video clip] president obama republican to try to rebrand themselves as the party of the middle class. Im glad they are doing it. I want them to start rethinking their positions on issues. I would love to work with them on stuff. But you cant just talk the talk. Youve got to walk the walk. You cant talk middleclass and then do things that hurt the middle class. You cant say you care about working people and then do things that hurt working people. I will give you an example. Republicans in washington have the chance to prove they really care about working families. Congress has to pass a budget. This month, or they risk shutting down the government for the second time in two years. Everybody knows the World Economy is pretty volatile right now. Our economy is a relative bright spot. We are doing better than j
Matters. If those three things factor in, are there those. Here on the phone lines 2025853881 for republicans, 2025853880 for democrats agend r independents, 2025853882. If you want to make your thoughts known by computer on do so as well. Roof us on twitter. Send an email to a journal at cspan. Org with the upcoming e leningsz, more stories about what people think and political people think about the future of the senate. I did highlighted in the New York Times this morning. Take a look at kansas. It says the probability forecast models fluctuate from week to week. They are based upon different methodologies. The Huffington Post forecast gave republicans a 54 chance of winning control of the senate. The New York Times model says 66 . The warrant post election lab prediction was 95 . The Election Consortium gave democrats a 49 of maintaining control. This highlights the current rates between pat roberts and greg orr saying here in kansas, the independent greg orman has certain the lead
And instead we embraced, and instead we returned to the truth that our parents and grandparents understood that the more a person learns the more a person earns. [applause] that a stronger middle class that a strong arer middle class is not the consequence of Economic Growth a stronger middle class is the cause of Economic Growth. [applause] im not even sure our parents and grandparents, democrats and republicans alike even had a word for that type of economics. They called it common sense. [laughter] in other words, the more money that workers earn, the better customers businesses have, and the better our economy grows. So together we actually, we passed the living wage. We raised the minimum wage to 10. 10 an hour. [applause] we made college we made college more affordable more more people and four years in a row without a pennys increase. We made our public schools, as tom mentioned the best in the country for five years in a row. We made it easier for people to vote and not harder.
Property programs for the upkeep of building so that they be in good shape. And what do i tell the 925,000 that goes to really and almost all cases small districts in what they are doing without money. You take care of 12 federal buildings instead of giving them the 925000. Were trying to get rid of these to be clear. To be clear easier at the payments and federal Property Program and moved it to the Facilities Management program. That is typically what you did. The goal is to eventually move properties to local districts. Local districts dont want them today. The other argument to the 67 million you might not agree with that, but the districts lost the Property Tax Base their because of federal activities. Those are one that have resulted in a lot of kids going to school for the Property Tax Bases reduce. Wouldve supported the billion dollars for the Impact Aid Program in the areas where they are having an impact on the student involvement. But what we understand as most of the school