And talk, of which was spun usual at that time and a very segregated city for the end of his life. This woman said that was his brother. The question of whether or not these connections even if they didnt talk about them, whether they did extend beyond millvinia and dolphuss father. As for this reunion, it was really fascinating. It was millvinias descendant and descendants of millvinias the owners lose some came from georgia and drove from alabama. We had a ceremony at Clayton County with this monument in honor of millvinia and her life. A kind of Exchange Stories about what they had known. They looked at each others photographs, they had a meal together, there is an effort underway in the town where millvinia lived in kingston, georgia, to do some commemorative work. She was in a cemetery, church cemetery, an effort to try to get one and i hear from the Shields Family often about when that will happen because they would like to come. I dont know how long this kind of connection and i
Festival serving as a moderator, and im pleased to be here with rachel l. Swams. I will tell you a few things about rachel because you came here to hear her and not me and our time is limited. She has worked for the New York Times since 1995. Reporting on domestic policy, national politics, immigration, the president ial campaign of 2004, and 2008, and first Lady Michele Obama and her role in the obama white house. I met rachel at an event this year where i bought a book, the book she wrote, american tapestry the story of the black, white, and multiracial ancestors of michelle obama. After hearing her talk, id bought six more copies. I bought them for all my family members and to give out as christmas gifts. Now after having read her book i can tell you it was a good investment. It helps me better understand my own family and many mysteries surrounding my own family. Rachel l. Swamss book is a compelling story that stirs deep emotions. It is also a story that would break them here and
Data i have this pattern. I wont know until this runs until the end of 15 after 3 years of data. I need 36 months of Historical Data to tell you how the house is operating. Any other questions . I just wanted to point out the acos are doing a great job on utilization. But part of the equation in total cost is unit cost and we have as we understand from blue shield some very Large Organizations that are renewing for 1115. This organization for blue shield is renewing for 15 with new contracts. So it doesnt get credit for all the work hes doing. Hes been very aggressive to work with the partners to ensure the unit cost is also going to be something we can sustain for 2015. Its based on also his work with the associations that we partner with. We are still in a two horse race. Blue shield and kaiser. Any questions . Any other questions . This is a discussion item. So, thank you very much. Any Public Comment on this item . Seeing none. Item no. 6. Also in item no. 6 there is a substitute,
Fully funded on the idnr and fully funded on the contingency . Yes. Congratulations. I was wrong. I voted for it. The question i have is if we have funded the i dnr and contingency reserve because the premiums were higher in the beginning because we had to establish that . Its possible. Yes. Im looking at it fwr that perspective. Im not saying im happy with five. You dont need the cash buildup or the Balance Sheet from the ibnr. Its all paid claims and i have to tweak it and do my stuff and now that we know all this. A lot of what we have to do in 15 is predicated upon experience which we dont know. Why i say all this stuff is that we be the bet ahead of the curve with the data i have this pattern. I wont know until this runs until the end of 15 after 3 years of data. I need 36 months of Historical Data to tell you how the house is operating. Any other questions . I just wanted to point out the acos are doing a great job on utilization. But part of the equation in total cost is unit co
The hospital. Can i make a request that we get a better system. My question is what is the structure that alliance their incentives with ours . They have acl claims targets that we fund. We set a certain amount of fundings that is a claims target and that is adjusted for certain anticipated to bring the cost down for standard studies for this set of risk. So i work with them and we agree that is hhs and with their actuarial people, if you hit these thresholds you will get a certain amount of money. Its fairly complex. Is it a with hold on the capitation . No. I dont know if we could as a trust do it that way, but its literal additional bonus. If they go below this, thats how. There is a massive amount because they are driven to hit these targets. These are in here . She is saying no, but we have actually, can i say, when we price the product, the spread in here, i didnt add the claims target as part of the idnr reserve. But the difference between the premium, we actually with hold that