i should mention that all of the people i interviewed said this isn t the only issue that is making donors flock to rubio. they like his foreign policy, which is very neo conservative. they like some of his policy proposals. but it s definitely a help. it s something that helps him, which is a pretty serious contrast from the campaign trail, where it continues to be something that s dragging him down. this point about neo conservative, there have been articles about him really courting the kind of neo conservative donor class. shell nielsen, sort of the top guy in that world. who apparently is we heard today is apparently leaning toward rubio. taking a shine to young mr. rubio. that s another place it does seem to me there is what voters want to hear and what donors want to hear on foreign policy. there is a little bit of a gap between the two. on foreign policy i wouldn t say the gap is as big. it depends on the issue, right? but certainly i think the average conservative
scott walker has basically flip-flopped on this and still seems to be in the driver s seat in terms of the kochs. it s definitely not a litmus test issue. that s my point. right. remember, mitt romney, in 2012, absolutely was the avatar for kind of the moneyed, pro business class. he was incredibly conservative on immigration. not in favor of immigration. it s definitely not a litmus test issue. i should mention that all of the people i interviewed said this isn t the only issue that is making donors flock to rubio. they like his foreign policy, which is very neo conservative. they like some of his policy proposals. but it s definitely a help. it s something that helps him, which is a pretty serious contrast from the campaign trail, where it continues to be something that s dragging him down. this point about neo conservative, there have been articles about him really courting the kind of neo conservative donor class. shell nielsen, sort of the top guy in that world. who appa