School district 2013, 14, reopener of proposal from the sheet Metal Workers union, local 104 to the San Franciscoen i identified School District. 2014, reopener initial proposal from the San Francisco Unified School District to the following common craft. International brotherhood of electrical workers ibew , local 6; carpenters and locksmiths, local 22; United Association ofjourneymen and apprentices of the plumbing and pipefitting industry of the United States and canada, local 39; united union ofroofers, waterproofers and allied workers, local 40; plasterers and shophands, local 66; sheet Metal Workers International Union, local 104; iron workers union, local 377; glaziers, Architectural Metal and glass workers union, local 718; teamsters, local 853; auto, marine and specialty painters, local 1176; and machinists union, local 1414. Superintendent, or carm elo, the comments on the sunshining of these proposals, please . I dont have any specific comments other than we are looking forw
Pac members in the Community Partners will hold the Community Conversations on the lcap in march and april and we will share our collective findings from the conversations and recommendations to the board and the district staff and the community in may. [ speaking in a. Any comments from the commissioners . And could you please note that mixer maufas has joined us. Any comments . No . Yes. Thank you, president , here i just want to kind of personally thank the pac for your stal ward participation in the 2025 visioning sessions and you were there for every session with great input and great impact, so i want to thank you on behave of the entire district for your participation. And i would just like to say thank you for taking this on and bringing us the parent voice that you give back, thank you so much for take thanksgiving and we appreciate it and we know that your participation on the Parent Advisory Council is voluntary and this is a Great Service to the district and the parents and
Proposals. 2013, 14, reopener initial proposal from the San Francisco Unified School District to united administrators of San Francisco. 2013, 14, reopener initial proposal from united administrators of San Francisco to the San Francisco Unified School District. 2013, 14, initial proposal from the San Francisco Unified School District to the International Union of operating engineers local 39. 2013, 2014, initial proposal from the International Union of operating engineers, local 39 to the San Francisco Unified School District 2013, 14, reopener of proposal from the sheet Metal Workers union, local 104 to the San Franciscoen i identified School District. 2014, reopener initial proposal from the San Francisco Unified School District to the following common craft. International brotherhood of electrical workers ibew , local 6; carpenters and locksmiths, local 22; United Association ofjourneymen and apprentices of the plumbing and pipefitting industry of the United States and canada, loca
Back to San Francisco. So that is the reason why. And he retired and when he retired and your people can look it up, the fact how long he was the only black worker at hetch hetchy. James rich. Its not jackson. So i dont want to get it twisted. When i was talking about e, i wanted to know whether or not he told me not to use his name, because nobody knew rich. That was why i was able to keep my name, because i have gone under jackson for so long. So he allowed me not to use his name. My concern when i saw about the electricians and remember when we had the shutdown before, i wanted to make sure that did not happen again. That was my only concern. I was not opposed to electricians, because they make good money, even for today. Thank you very much. Thank you, doctor, i will followup on your comment because we commented on same item you remember and the information that we requested at that time was with respect to accepting the work contract, is there any connection between who is perform
Recall that we passed a resolution by a 101 vote opposing that plan. Now, the National Park service has come forward with a supplemental proposal that still has significant restrictions on dog access that will still impact many residents of San Francisco and that will have a very negative impact on our San Francisco neighborhood parks. When dog access is restricted at the dgnra properties, these dogs will not simply disappear. They will go elsewhere. Their owners will take them elsewhere, their professional dog walkers will take them elsewhere and that elsewhere is city and county San Francisco parks. We already have some over crowding issues in some of our dog parks and that will be exacerbated. That makes it more a reason to work closely with San Francisco to formulate its dog management plan. I do not believe it has done so to the extent it needs to and in fact the environmental document has analysis of what it will do to this park if the plan comes into play. We need to send a mess