frequently that it wish he wouldn t say. i don t have control over that. the fact that he shouldn t have gone down that road is a long way from saying, therefore, he should be impeached anticipate forcibly removed from office after the american people voted in an election. reporter: 1600 miles away in new jersey, nancy lawrence a registered independent is sounding off about the man she once supported. i voted for trump because i wanted change. but i feel the change we got was a little bit of lying and cheating and i do believe he needs to be impeached. reporter: as voters weigh in nationwide new polling suggests americans are largely split over whether they approve are nancy pelosi s impeachment inquiry. though one night pbs released poll has limitations on representativeness. gentleman still ahead the trump administration is under scrutiny for hiding the president s calls
the intelligence committee chairman, he says he wants to move ahead with hearings as quickly as possible. he said they could be as soon as next week with witness depositions and the like. he wouldn t say who he want to bring forward, but as the democrats move forward with the impeachment inquiry, attempting to move on articles of impeachment as soon as this fall, the democrats are moving pretty rapidly with the house intelligence committee, including members coming back to washington to carry out the investigation. we ll see how the senate proceeds. right now richard burr taking a different tack than his colleagues, not talking about the veracity of the whistleblower s complaint, unlike a lot of republicans who are dismissing the concerns. just moments ago tim scott, a republican from south carolina, told tom barrett that the whistleblower complaint is nothing but hearsay. he says he wants to investigate this fully. john? we ll watch.
he s doing that in plain sight at every opportunity when it comes to the allegations about former vice president biden and his son s business in the ukraine pushing that at every opportunity trying to deflect here. and, you know, you heard the dni maguire today testify, and he would not impune the credibility of the whistle-blower. you already talked about how he said the whistle-blower did everything right. so he s not participating in the president and republican efforts to smear this whistle-blower as a partisan, something that the president republicans have already put forward on social media and in other interviews. but he did get sort of caught short when he was asked by chairman schiff if he d spoken with the president, you know, about the whistle-blower and revealed to the president the identity perhaps or the nature of some of the things that were in this report, this complaint. and he would not answer that question. he wouldn t say that he had not spoken with the president. a
overreact. we ll take a measured response and make sure we don t close the door to diplomacy. he wouldn t say if the new images could one day launch a nuclear missile and change the u.s. military s calculus. the images appeared when kim jong-un visited the shipyard and stood in front of a modified 1960s era submarine to one day fire a ballistic missile. while north cree has not test add long range missile since 2017, the seven launches of short range missiles have allowed japan and south korea and the u.s. now satellite photos show that north korea continues to build out their other nuclear platforms. the submarine is a little more than a year away from deployment but the missile systems could be tested in the coming weeks.
jurisdictions in congress, we are responsible for the entire administration of justice and things so important as border security, immigration, we can t get to those substantive issues because we are spending so much time precious time, precious taxpayer resources on the endless investigations. arthel: right. i m sick of it as well. we need it to come to an end. the fish rots from the head as they say, so without getting into what s in the head, whether it s a clean head or rotten head, nothing gets done and that s why i keep circling back, do you not want to find what in fact, the president do in terms of potential on obstruction of justice? that s the point. that s what the special counsel did arthel: he pointed out 10 examples, at least 10 examples of potential obstruction of justice. of course, he wouldn t say that was obstruction, that s what i m saying, that s your job to investigate that.