well, the democrats treated justice kavanaugh so badly, so, you know, if we ask judge jackson about some other rulings, well, that s just fair game. just to clarify, he wasn t accused of being a rapist. he was accused of sexually assaulting women as a teenager, and there was evidence there were live witnesses in the persons of the women who made the accusations. but, of course, this is just his inability to defend, actually, the indefensible, which is hawley. they talk about the what about-ism sort of stuff. i will say that if they have any information about her ethical background, about her personal behavior, they should spit it out, because there is none. and i think unlike judge kavanaugh, there won t be a need to go back and have an extra fbi investigation. she was, of course, just
show them maybe areas in there that brian frequented, also areas that he and his son had hiked and camped in. but the family attorney released a statement as well later in the day that said there were no discoveries and hopefully brian will be located soon, anderson. and just i just want to double back. when you said that the police were kind of observing brian laundrie, obviously you said there are limitations, you know, he wasn t accused of a crime or charged with a crime. do we know anything more about that? like what kind of observations? were they actually surveilling him? do we know? reporter: it sounded to me as if he was very careful about what he was saying, because this is an ongoing investigation, he doesn t want to compromise the investigation. but he did confirm that there was surveillance. it sounded like it was a bit of a loose surveillance where they had some eyes on him but obviously if they had known he gave that example of, if he was in the reserve they weren
but there s other information that would be stored longer in the cloud. for example, maybe internet searches that she did which could possibly prove to be very valuable to investigators, anderson. and today brian laundrie s father went into that nature preserve with authorities. is there any detail on that? reporter: he went in early this morning with law enforcement, and we understand from the laundrie family attorney that he was in there to show them maybe areas in there that brian frequented, also areas that he and his son had hiked and camped in. but the family attorney released a statement as well later in the day that said there were no discoveries and hopefully brian will be located soon, anderson. and just i just want to double back. when you said that the police were kind of observing brian laundrie, obviously you said there are limitations, you know, he wasn t accused of a crime or charged with a crime. do we know anything more about that? like what kind of of observa
david camm did not act alone. he had a co-conspirator. the ex-cop and the ex-con were each charged with the three killings. david was outraged. he believed he should have been set free. after all, charles boney s signature was all over the scene. he attacks women, defenseless, innocent women. he takes their shoes, their socks. he holds guns to their heads and threatens to shoot them in the head. you know, all of those things from his previous crimes, this is exactly what happened to kim. why can t they see this stuff? you know, they just turn a blind eye to the facts. but the prosecutor had a different set of facts. we know that the defense has maintained that this is now the killer, that i should dismiss the charges against david camm, the evidence is not there. in january 2006, charles boney and david camm stood trial separately in two different courthouses. while he wasn t accused of being the shooter, boney was found guilty on three counts of murder
he believed he should have been set free. after all, charles boney s signature was all over the scene. he attacks women, defenseless, innocent women. he takes their shoes, their socks. he holds guns to their heads and threatens to shoot them in the head. you know, all of those things from his previous crimes, this is exactly what happened to kim. why can t they see this stuff? you know, they just turn a blind eye to the facts. reporter: but the prosecutor had a different set of facts. we know that the defense has maintained that this is now the killer, that i should dismiss the charges against david camm, the evidence is not there. reporter: in january 2006, charles boney and david camm stood trial separately in two different courthouses. while he wasn t accused of being the shooter, boney was found guilty on three counts of murder in the deaths of kim, brad, and jill cam. he was sentenced to 225 years. and the prosecution team rejected any notion that boney acted alone.