i think what we haven t heard before is details about his relationship with his then girlfriend, chelsy davy. the court documents revealed more about the concerns she had, as well as the duke and she felt inevitably the relationship broke up because of the intrusion of the media and because of the unlawful activities that were going on by some of the newspapers. every time he was in a relationship or even a rumoured relationship that whole person s family and often their friends would be dragged into the chaos and find themselves the subject of unlawful activity on the part of mgm, say the lawyers. there was nothing and nowhere off limits. for the first time, prince harry suggesting his relationship with miss davy was over in essence because of the activities by the newspaper. she felt, the court has heard in documents, a royal life was not for her. and what was interesting about this case, the scale that is alleged that
into the chaos and find themselves the subject of unlawful activity on the subject of unlawful activity on the part of mgn, say the lawyers. there was nothing or know where that was off limits. we here for the first time prince harry suggesting that his relationship with chelsea davey was overdue to antics by the newspaper. she felt, the court is heard in documents, that a royal life was not for her. but i think is also interesting about this case is this scale that s being alleged that the mirror newspapers used these sorts of activities and the scale of who knew, the suggestion being that journalists, editors, right up to board level, including piers morgan, the very famous editor at the time he of course denies any involvement in anything unlawful, particularly phone hacking, but plenty to come out in the next several weeks. let s turn to the us, where donald trump has said he will appeal against the verdict
there will come a day when donald trump is gone, but your dishonor will remain the times describes vice chair of that committee, liz cheney, as a woman singularly obsessed with the committee s work, who sacrificed her own political future ofor what she felt was right cheney had a significant hand in the writing and editing of the scripts. she also shaped the committee s process down to who was served subpoenas and lines of questioning. what was impossible to ignore in the end was cheney s contribution to a committee that was expected to flounder as so many other congressional hearing had before it. over the course of 18 months, the committee interviewed over a thousand witnesses, pored over a million documents, held nearly a dozen public hearings, and ultimately made the historic decision to refer an ex-president for criminal prosecution. the times concludes with this comment by a witness from the committee s fourth public hearing, judge michael ludig
hutchinson about what she was specificallied to, what she felt, who she wasn t told, who she did not hear from that day. those kinds of things that can maybe weaken, i guess, this report, but also put it in a different context. the more that the committee, the more the prosecutor, the more the special counsel can make those connections directly to the president, the stronger it gets. the more it goes on, this is a gift for a prosecutor, but i also may have some lumps of coal in it for them to deal with down the road. michael, so the first 34 transcripts we received, they had in common this pleading the fifth. we saw it from john eastman. we saw it from michael flynn, kelly ward of the arizona republican party. how will the department of justice be able to get more from these people than did the january 6th committee in the house? well, i mean, that s usually the trick.
to think about the parallels of the conversations that are happening stateside, obviously, the ideas of who is entitled to be an american, who is thought of as a real american, the ideas of white supremacy, replacement theory so many different areas that we are grappling with. it seems really globally about these issues. it s almost a subtlety, of the ignorance, that is so stunning. the attempted subtlety of it, because she was there, i understand, for the 16 days for activism. she was there believing she has been asked about the organization she represented, the idea of trying to help to stop abuse of women and girls. and then, in that moment, there is a kind of an abuse that s happening that she felt, but being almost brow beaten inch having to say, well yeah, i guess i m really not one of you. yeah, there s a class thing going on as well.