but i think the president has illuminated his thinking on that, it was the beginning of the administration, it was who jeff sessions wanted, and now you see jeff sessions, barely the attorney general, on the most important investigation in the country. there is a practical consideration here, though here, and a political one, obviously. if he resigns, legally, the president replaces the two positions, deputy attorney general, attorney general in charge of the russia investigation, he has both hats. he can do it. replacing them. if he fires rosenstein, then he can t. then he s got to put up a nominee, go to the senate for confirmation. there s a process. so it matters from a practicality standpoint. yeah, it s just not something that a member of congress has any impact or influence over. to me, the bigger question is, are you going to allow this activity to occur within the administration? we know that there are people inside the trump administration that are actively working agains
over which hotel to put him in. and i had always said, the ritz carlton is a place for donald trump, in one of their elegant sweets. we never specified which one. eventually, emin agreed. and so when i read the prove innocence, that s why trump wanted to be there, because the obamas had slept there and the alleged peeing incident, to me i was like, if it happened, he must have worked really quickly, because he barely knew where he was staying anyway, and there was only this very small window of time when it could have taken place. because all the rest of the time, he was with us. but is it true he stayed there, because he has said on the record, i didn t stay there. well, the old rob goldstone publicist would have said, 100% he stay there had, this experience i have been through has allowed me to keep a 10% question mark, where i go, of course he stayed there, we dropped him off there, he came down the next morning at 7:00 a.m. could it be that in the middle of the night he was whi
they made colin kaepernick the face of their new ad campaign about empowerment. and how did it go? they cashed in, my friends, to the tune of $6 billion in market value. that s almost as much as the earlier this month, president trump claimed nike was getting absolutely killed with anger and boycotts. we judge that a wrong. don lemon is here. cnn tonight is just minutes away. wrong, all caps, underlined, my friend. by the way, there is no proof that he s actually a billionaire. i ve spoken to a lot of people who deal with money, and they say there s no proof. yeah, $6 billion is a lot of money. you know what that shows you? the loudest voices aren t always the majority, and maybe you shouldn t always listen to the loudest voices or the people who burn their gear or who react politically to every single story. i think the majority of the country, the right-thinking people understand what colin kaepernick is respectfully and
and then if there are no significant charges regarding collusion, he gets the ultimate vindication. now, the best part of this argument in my opinion is that it relies on something that s actually true. messing with mueller is a mistake for trump. it is a bad look and creates bad outcomes. if he does nothing, however, and the probe winds up and he doesn t get touched, it is over, period. anything short of the probe finding its natural end, like what happens if he fires or gets a resignation, the stench of speculation will be forever. a stink that is omni present but with no identifiable source like the stink of a basement with a dead rat in it that you just can t find. is that what the president wants? i argue no. and that s why against all odds, what may happen with the president and rosenstein is
from rosenstein? what i don t like about those denials is that he does not complicitly deny saying that he raised the prospect of wearing a wire on the president. you think he s a little cute in the denials? i do. and if you look at him, he really does leave that prospect open. but it s unfair to the country for you and i to be having this discussion in the absence of facts under oath. that s the only way we re going to get it done. and here s what i worry about, chris. i worry that our leadership wants to send us home at the end of the week and tell us to go campaign for the midterms and that we won t really get these answers. rod rosenstein s impeachment can be brought up for a vote by any member of congress at this point. it lights a two-day fuse. mark meadows and i have said, if we don t get these answers under oath, we may invoke that vote to keep the congress in town so we can get to the bottom of this. that wouldn t make you very popular. i m already very popular. zpl