so what do we care? you re not going to put me into a box it s liberals who put this out about other liberals. so nice, right? she didn t run. sean: let s go to the legality. legal, not legal. tamara? i don t think there s anything wrong with these guys standing outside the door after the opening. there s no expectation of privacy here. not true. back in 1974 almost finish, expert lawyer. in 1974 you want to quote from law. there s a law, five years in jail. state law for eavesdropping that s a felony. a lot of issues are at issue, and everybody is blaming each other. the democrat official, the attorney saying it wasn t me. you can t watch crime, you know, and say you didn t do it. sean: jordan, hold on.
so what do we care? you re not going to put me into a box it s liberals who put this out about other liberals. so nice, right? she didn t run. sean: let s go to the legality. legal, not legal. tamara? i don t think there s anything wrong with these guys standing outside the door after the opening. there s no expectation of privacy here. not true. back in 1974 almost finish, expert lawyer. in 1974 you want to quote from law. there s a law, five years in jail. state law for eavesdropping that s a felony. a lot of issues are at issue, and everybody is blaming each other. the democrat official, the attorney saying it wasn t me. you can t watch crime, you know, and say you didn t do it. sean: jordan, hold on.
could be the first commander in chief wants to be. the question is not whether but wither. did hillary learn from her healthy to be more transparent and less my way or the highway? did she learn after voting to support nonsense cal invasion of iraq that she doesn t need to be overcompensate to show she s tough? the real question about hillary is this. when people take a new look at her in the coming years, will they say the past or future mrs. clinton or madam president? i think, tina brown, to me, at least i ll be surprised if she he didn t run. sort of the way to look at it. she clearly is going to be gearing up for a run. i do think those questions that we just heard are tremendously out of date at this point. it did seem to me like an era at
powell before the u.n. or condoleezza rice and the mushroom clouds. i mean, when these figures are testifying. it was such a you know, they were looking senator mccain was looking for something. he didn t run against susan rice in a presidential election. so why take it out on susan rice? she s obama s surrogate in this case. right. david? richard, i know the point that you re making and again, this is not about the merits but mccain and graham and then senator ayotte, i mean, they were looking and are still looking to blame this administration about what happened in benghazi, they do not feel they ve been forthcoming. there s huge policy issues with how we went into libya. so i m not surprised that they went after a surrogate of the president to not only go after those particular points but the broader benghazi approach. i mean, the idea that there s a proxy for the president who, you know, is getting a lot of the blame, i don t know that it s particularly surprising
wouldn t be surprised if she didn t run. i know you are convinced she is running. i m not convinced. i will be shocked if she doesn t run. steve schmitt, have we had any parallel like this? have we had anyone in either party who four years away from it is such an obvious and formidable front-runner, nonincumbent front-runner like this? not that i thick of. one of the remarkable things, when you look at her polling numbers is the degree to which she has transcended her controversies over her career. she has become an ecumenical figure in politics. she is admired by an awful lot of republicans and republican women. she has an awful lot of time to make her decision. she freezes the democratic primary process in place. everybody will have to wait to see what she wants to do. she is not going to be compelled to get in this early and have a three-year campaign or a