back on that plane. some questions, of course, about what exactly he was doing in brazil. he was promoting this social media site getter that he runs now that he s left the employ of former president donald trump. he met with bolsonaro, the right-wing president. some questions, though, remain about what exactly was going on. how much of this detainment has to do with the domestic political in brazil. it alluded to the detainment. that s right. he didn t name jason miller by name, but this is clearly another play in this domestic dispute in brazil. miller not answering really a lot of questions about what exactly he was talking to bolsonaro about, but we know that getter, his social media site which he s promoting, a conservative alternative to twitter among many others that are cropping up over the last few months, has a significant part of its customer base in
but he also really pointed the finger at a number of countries for not going fast enough and for others for cutting down their forests. he didn t name brazil and indonesia, but they were certainly in his sights, and he was particularly strong on china saying that china s promise to limit its emissions or peak its emissions by 2030 just wasn t good enough. they would have to do more quicker or the rest of the world would be in trouble and the 1.5 degree warming target that s in the paris agreement wouldn t be met. he was very strong on that and saying the us wanted to work with china but the chinese certainly had to do more and others, too. he was very strong in saying that countries had promised back in paris to meet certain targets but their collective efforts to date meant essentially, we d blow right past them and the world would be a very warm and pretty hellish place by the end of the century even if we achieved all the paris targets. what they re talking about now is a rapid
his own experience in london. but he also really pointed the finger at a number of countries for not going fast enough and for others for cutting down their forests. he didn t name brazil and indonesia, but they were certainly in his sights, and he was particularly strong on china saying that china s promise to limit its emissions or pique its emissions by 2030 just wasn t good enough. they would have to do more quicker or the rest of the world would be in trouble and the 1.5 degree warming target that s in the paris agreement wouldn t be met. he was very strong on that and saying the us wanted to work with china but the chinese certainly had to do more and others, too. he was very strong in saying that countries had promised back in paris to meet certain targets but their collective efforts to date meant essentially, we d blow right past them and the world would be a very warm and pretty hellish place by the end of the century even if we achieved all the paris targets. what they re
interview who interviewed patrick a couple days ago. so you get a sense based on the interview that you had with deval patrick, how does he plan to try to bridge this divide? he sees himself as that center alternative, somebody who can appeal to a voter who maybe doesn t want medicare for all and maybe is uncomfortable with all of the very transformative positions that the more left leaning candidates have. but who don t want a nostalgic candidate. he didn t name joe biden by name. but that is what he meant. but squomeone who is in the center. he thinks he has a broad background as a governor and his experience in business which s drawn criticism. he says capitalism isn t bad, someone who understands how business works is important. so he is trying to thread this very careful needle, very late in the game, but he also has to
that was his ethos, he s no longer president and he will step back and let the next leader do what they want. although he didn t name president trump in that statement, it was very clear who he was talking about, the language he was talking about. this may, on the democratic side be different. wasn t those individuals, every single candidate saying something. on president trump s his allies are saying, they re using this for cynical ends to try to reboot their campaigns or political ends. you look at the democratic field, because we have been living with mass shootings so long, back column columbine, it just a political issue, not just a national security issue. at this point, just about everyone in this country has